Vendredi 2 janvier 2009 5 02 /01 /Jan /2009 00:37

Il y a deux ans, durant les premiers jours qui ont suivi notre retour, nous avons été, tous je pense, en proie à un véritable délire. Nous voulions parler, être entendus enfin. On nous dit que notre apparence physique était assez éloquente à elle seule. Mais nous revenions juste, nous ramenions avec nous notre mémoire, notre expérience toute vivante et nous éprouvions un désir frénétique de la dire telle quelle. Et dès les premiers jours cependant, il nous paraissait impossible de combler la distance que nous découvrions entre le langage dont nous disposions et cette expérience que, pour la plupart, nous étions encore en train de poursuivre dans notre corps. Comment nous résigner à ne pas tenter d'expliquer comment nous en étions venus là ? Nous y étions encore. Et cependant c'était impossible. À peine commencions-nous à raconter, que nous suffoquions. À nous-mêmes, ce que nous avions à dire commençait alors à nous paraître inimaginable.
  Cette disproportion entre l'expérience que nous avions vécue et le récit qu'il était possible d'en faire ne fit que se confirmer par la suite. Nous avions donc bien affaire à l'une de ces réalités qui font dire qu'elles dépassent l'imagination. Il était clair désormais que c'était seulement par le choix, c'est-à-dire encore par l'imagination que nous pouvions essayer d'en dire quelque chose.
  J'ai essayé de retracer ici la vie d'un kommando (Gandersheim) d'un camp de concentration allemand (Buchenwald).
  On sait aujourd'hui que, dans les camps de concentration d'Allemagne, tous les degrés possibles de l'oppression ont existé. Sans tenir compte des différents types d'organisation qui existaient entre certains camps, les différentes applications d'une même règle pouvaient augmenter ou réduire sans proportion les chances de survie.
  Les dimensions seules de notre kommando entraînaient le contact étroit et permanent entre les détenus et l'appareil directeur SS. Le rôle des intermédiaires était d'avance réduit au minimum. Il se trouve qu'à Gandersheim, l'appareil intermédiaire était entièrement constitué par des détenus allemands de droit commun. Nous étions donc cinq cents hommes environ, qui ne pouvions éviter d'être en contact avec les SS, et encadrés non par des politiques, mais par des assassins, des voleurs, des escrocs, des sadiques ou des trafiquants de marché noir. Ceux-ci, sous les ordres des SS, ont été nos maîtres directs et absolus.
  Il importe de marquer que la lutte pour le pouvoir entre les détenus politiques et les détenus de droit commun n'a jamais pris le sens d'une lutte entre deux factions qui auraient brigué le pouvoir. C'était la lutte entre des hommes dont le but était d'instaurer une légalité, dans la mesure où une légalité était encore possible dans une société conçue comme infernale, et des hommes dont le but était d'éviter à tout prix l'instauration de cette légalité, parce qu'ils pouvaient seulement fructifier dans une société sans lois. Sous eux ne pouvait régner que la loi SS toute nue. Pour vivre, et même bien vivre, ils ne pouvaient être amenés qu'à aggraver la loi SS. Ils ont joué en ce sens un rôle de provocateurs. Ils ont provoqué et maintenu parmi nous avec un acharnement et une logique remarquables l'état d'anarchie qui leur était nécessaire. Ils jouaient parfaitement le jeu. Non seulement ils s'affirmaient ainsi aux yeux des SS comme différents de nous par nature, ils apparaissaient aussi à leurs yeux comme des auxiliaires indispensables et méritaient effectivement de bien vivre. Affamer un homme pour avoir à le punir ensuite parce qu'il vole des épluchures et, de ce fait, mériter la récompense du SS et, par exemple, obtenir en récompense la soupe supplémentaire qui affamera davantage l'homme, tel était le schéma de leur tactique.
  Notre situation ne peut donc être assimilée à celle des détenus qui se trouvaient dans des camps ou dans des kommandos ayant pour responsables des politiques. Même lorsque ces responsables politiques, comme il est arrivé, s'étaient laissé corrompre, il était rare qu'ils n'aient pas gardé un certain sens de l'ancienne solidarité et une haine de l'ennemi commun qui les empêchaient d'aller aux extrémités auxquelles se livraient sans retenue les droit commun.
  À Gandersheim, nos responsables étaient nos ennemis.
  L'appareil administratif étant donc l'instrument, encore aiguisé, de l'oppression SS, la lutte collective était vouée à l'échec. L'échec, c'était le lent assassinat par les SS et les kapos réunis. Toutes les tentatives que certains d'entre nous entreprirent furent vaines.
  En face de cette coalition toute-puissante, notre objectif devenait le plus humble. C'était seulement de survivre. Notre combat, les meilleurs d'entre nous n'ont pu le mener que de façon individuelle. La solidarité même était devenue affaire individuelle.
  Je rapporte ici ce que j'ai vécu. L'horreur n'y est pas gigantesque. Il n'y avait à Gandersheim ni chambre à gaz, ni crématoire. L'horreur y est obscurité, manque absolu de repère, solitude, oppression incessante, anéantissement lent. Le ressort de notre lutte n 'aura été que la revendication forcenée, et presque toujours elle-même solitaire, de rester, jusqu 'au bout, des hommes.
  Les héros que nous connaissons, de l'histoire ou des littératures, qu'ils aient crié l'amour, la solitude, l'angoisse de l'être ou du non-être, la vengeance, qu 'ils se soient dressés contre l'injustice, l'humiliation, nous ne croyons pas qu 'ils aient jamais été amenés à exprimer comme seule et dernière revendication, un sentiment ultime d 'appartenance à l'espèce.
  Dire que l'on se sentait alors contesté comme homme, comme membre de l'espèce, peut apparaître comme un sentiment rétrospectif, une explication après coup. C'est cela cependant qui fut le plus immédiatement et constamment sensible et vécu, et c'est cela d'ailleurs, exactement cela, qui fut voulu par les autres. La mise en question de la qualité d'homme provoque une revendication presque biologique d'appartenance à l'espèce humaine. Elle sert ensuite à méditer sur les limites de cette espèce, sur sa distance à la nature et sa relation avec elle, sur une certaine solitude de l'espèce donc, et pour finir, surtout à concevoir une vue claire de son unité indivisible.

Robert Antelme, L'Espèce humaine, Gallimard, 1947 

Par Charles de La Barre - Publié dans : overreaction
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Vendredi 26 décembre 2008 5 26 /12 /Déc /2008 17:00
Les hauts revenus du show-biz, du sport et de l’entreprise
le 23 décembre 2008
Les revenus annuels du show-biz, du sport et de l’entreprise représentent pour certains plus de 1 000 années de Smic en France, 5 000 années aux Etats-Unis...

Les sommes perçues par quelques personnalités du sport, du show-business ou de l’entreprise sont astronomiques, hors de portée du commun des mortels. Elles s’expriment en centaines, voire en milliers d’année de Smic. Qu’est-ce qui peut justifier de tels niveaux ? Certainement pas l’effort : les métiers les plus pénibles sont aussi les moins bien payés. L’effort physique, sauf pour les sportifs, est totalement dévalorisé. Les catégories les plus aisées n’ont pas la même notion du travail que la majorité de la population. Il s’agit très souvent d’activités qui s’apparentent plutôt à ce que d’autres, plus modestes, appellent du loisir (repas, lectures, etc.). Elles disposent, de plus, des moyens financiers pour se décharger des tâches les plus pénibles par l’emploi de personnel extérieur.

Les revenus des plus riches ne reposent pas sur les mêmes facteurs. Même s’ils disposent très souvent d’une équipe autour d’eux, les stars du sport ou du show-business doivent leurs ressources à un mélange de marketing savant et de talent personnel. Les dirigeants d’entreprise doivent leurs émoluments à leurs responsabilités, les décisions qu’ils prennent, mais pour une part beaucoup plus importante à la valeur créée par des milliers de salariés, rémunérés plusieurs centaines de fois moins qu’eux et qui pourtant œuvrent dans des conditions plus difficiles. L’affaiblissement des syndicats, représentants des salariés les moins qualifiés, de surcroît davantage touchés par le chômage, laisse plus facilement la voie libre pour octroyer des revenus aussi démesurés qui au final ne sont que très peu contestés.

Les revenus des sportifs en France
  Sport
Revenus annuels en millions d'euros
En années de Smic
Thierry Henry Football 14 1 183
Tony Parker Basket 11 930
Patrick Viera Football 7 592
William Gallas Football 6,4 541
Claude Makele Football 4,9 414
Lilian Thuram Football 4,7 397
David Trezeguet Football 4,5 380
Nicolas Anelka Football 4,1 347
Djibril Cissé Football 3,9 330
Louis Saha Football 3,8 321
Ces données comprennent les éléments officiels (salaires et primes notamment) et une évaluation des revenus annexes (sponsors). Ils n'intègrent pas les revenus privés des joueurs, notamment leurs revenus du patrimoine (placement, immobilier, etc.). Ils minimisent donc certainement la réalité.
Source : Magazine Capital, n°181, octobre 2006. Données 2006-2007
Les revenus des stars du cinéma en France
  Revenus annuels
en millions d'euros
En années de Smic
Gérard Depardieu 4,3 363
Thierry Lhermitte 3 254
Jean Reno 3 254
Jean Dujardin 2,7 228
Michel Blanc 2,3 194
Christian Clavier 2 169
Daniel Auteuil 1,8 152
Valérie Lemercier 1,6 135
Franck Dubosc 1 85
Mathilde Seigner 0,7 59
Moyenne estimée sur 2005-2006 à partir des contrats déposés au Centre national de la cinématographie (cachets, participation aux recettes, bonus).
Source : Magazine Capital, n°181, octobre 2006. Année des données : 2006
Les revenus des cadres très supérieurs en France
  Revenus annuels
en millions d
En années de Smic
Patron d'une salle de marché (achète et vend sur les marchés financiers) 5 423
Banquier d'affaires 5 423
Styliste d'une griffe de luxe 5 423
Avocat associé d'un grand cabinet d'affaires 4 338
Gérant de fonds spéculatif 2 169
Consultant en organisation 0,8 68
Directeur financier d'un groupe coté 0,8 68
Directeur des ressources humaines d'un grand groupe 0,45 38
Directeur de la communication d'un grand groupe 0,4 34
Directeur de création d'agence publicitaire 0,4 34
Attention, il s'agit d'évaluation de salaires maximum pour ces professions. Ne comprend pas d'autres avantages éventuels (stock options, frais, etc.).
Source : Magazine Capital, n°181, octobre 2006, d'après les cabinets de recrutement. Année des données : 2005
Les plus hauts revenus de l'économie de la célébrité* dans le monde
  Activités
Montants (en millions d'euros)
En années de Smic
Oprah Winfrey Télévision 186 15 500
Steven Spielberg Cinéma 79 6 548
Tiger Woods Sport 71 5 952
Johnny Depp Cinéma 66 5 476
The Rolling Stones Musique 63 5 238
Jay-Z Musique 59 4 940
Tom Hanks Cinéma 53 4 405
Madonna Musique 51 4 286
Bon Jovi Musique 48 3 988
Jerry Seinfeld Cinéma 43 3 571
Elton John Musique 38 3 155
Céline Dion Musique 32 2 679
Oscar De La Hoya Sport 31 2 560
Phil Mickelson Sport 30 2 500
Kimi Raikkonen Sport 29 2 381
* Animateurs de télévision, réalisateurs de films, sportifs, acteurs, chanteurs... Tableau extrait de : "Les très hauts revenus dans le sport, la culture et le management", Jean-François Bourg - Revue d'économie politique n°3-2008
Source : Forbes - juillet 2006 / juin 2007





Par Charles de La Barre - Publié dans : overreaction
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Jeudi 18 décembre 2008 4 18 /12 /Déc /2008 07:21
Dans une lettre aux clients de son fonds d'investissement, Ascot Partners, le 12 décembre, Ezra Merkin, ex-PDG de GMAC, la filiale financière de General Motors (GM), leur annonçait que "près de la totalité" des fonds qu'ils lui avaient confiés avaient été investis chez Bernard Madoff, l'homme aujourd'hui soupçonné par la justice d'avoir organisé une carambouille portant sur 50 milliards de dollars (environ 37 milliards d'euros). "Je suis sous le choc, s'excusait M. Merkin. Moi aussi, je subis des pertes majeures dans cette catastrophe." Le financier a des raisons toutes personnelles de s'arracher les cheveux. M. Madoff, alias "Bernie", était son ami. Ils siégeaient ensemble au conseil de surveillance de l'université juive new-yorkaise Yeshiva. Ezra Merkin n'est qu'une des victimes parmi les milliers de clients triés sur le volet auxquels Bernard Madoff Investment Securities (BMIS) a offert ses services, leur assurant un intérêt systématiquement supérieur de 3% à 4% à celui réalisé par d'autres gestionnaires… Tout en pillant leur capital.

 

Là n'est pas la moindre des énigmes de ce qui pourrait constituer la plus grande escroquerie de l'histoire de la finance. Habituellement, les "gogos" qui se laissent prendre à la fraude dite "pyramidale" – celle où les investisseurs d'hier sont rémunérés avec les dépôts de leurs successeurs et non avec les produits de leurs placements – sont des petits porteurs aveuglés par leur ignorance. Cette fois, les premiers grugés émargent au gratin de la finance. Non seulement de riches particuliers, mais aussi de grandes institutions financières dont la liste s'allonge chaque jour se sont laissé prendre.

UNE "RELATION CONSANGUINE"

Tous "se sont volontairement aveuglés parce qu'ils voulaient croire en leurs gains", a déclaré Harry Markopolos, un concurrent de BMIS. Dès 1999, il avait alerté la SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission), le "gendarme" de la Bourse new-yorkaise. Car, même en période de recul boursier, le fonds Madoff affichait des résultats exceptionnels. De 1996 à 2008, il n'a officiellement connu que cinq mois négatifs. Selon Charles Gradante, fondateur du consultant Hennessee Group, "aucune stratégie d'investissement au monde ne peut générer ce genre de performances". Non seulement les intérêts offerts par BMIS étaient très avantageux, mais ses commissions, calculées non pas sur les montants gérés mais sur les transactions effectuées, étaient très en dessous de celles pratiquées ailleurs.

Cela n'a inquiété personne. En tout cas pas la SEC. Comment expliquer que, malgré trois enquêtes en huit ans, malgré le fait que BMIS avait cessé d'être enregistré auprès d'elle depuis septembre 2006 (alors que tout gestionnaire de plus de quinze portefeuilles doit l'être), elle n'a jamais rien vu? Mieux, elle avait nommé M. Madoff membre de son comité sur la structure des marchés… "Pour la SEC, c'est une débâcle", juge Joel Seligman, historien de la finance. Sur la chaîne CNBC, les commentateurs se déchaînaient, lundi 15 décembre : seule la "relation consanguine" entre Bernie Madoff, ex-patron du Nasdaq, la Bourse des valeurs technologiques, et les dirigeants de la SEC explique leur exceptionnelle bienveillance.

Des énigmes, les enquêteurs du FBI (Bureau fédéral d'enquêtes) devront en déchiffrer d'autres. Depuis quand durait la fraude? Dix ans? Vingt? Plus? M. Madoff assure avoir agi seul, mais qui peut y croire? Comment expliquer que le commissaire aux comptes de BMIS ait été un minuscule cabinet de l'Etat de New York? Comment ce simple fait n'a-t-il pas suscité d'interrogations? D'autant que les résultats du fonds Madoff sont apparus encore plus étonnants dans la période récente. Plus les marchés boursiers s'effondraient, plus sa rentabilité fictive faisait figure d'exception. Comme si le principe le plus basique du boursicoteur fonctionnait malgré la crise : plus on gagne, moins on est tenté de s'interroger sur le pourquoi et le comment du gain.

"RABATTEUR"

Pour ses clients les plus fortunés, "Bernie" avait créé une "liste A", génératrice de rapports encore plus élevés, mais pour laquelle la mise était plus conséquente. Pour les appâter, ses courtiers "ratissaient" les country clubs et les golfs les plus huppés. Là, ils expliquaient que seule leur relation personnelle avec M. Madoff pouvait leur en ouvrir l'accès. Ensuite, ce dernier avait sa manière d'instiller la confiance. Au départ, a expliqué l'analyste financier Richard Spring, de Boca Raton (Floride), qui lui servait de "rabatteur", M.Madoff insistait pour que ses nouveaux clients ne lui confient que des sommes modestes. "Bernie me disait : Laissez-les commencer petit. S'ils sont contents après un an ou deux, ils pourront en mettre plus ", a-t-il dit au Wall Street Journal. Tout analyste qu'il est, M. Spring s'y est lui-même laissé prendre. Il a confié à BMIS 11 millions de dollars, soit 95% de sa fortune : "C'est dire combien j'avais confiance."

Reste l'énigme maîtresse : où sont les 50 milliards de dollars? Combien en reste-t-il dans les caisses, combien se sont évaporés? Et comment? Sur le site Internet de BMIS, on lit désormais deux phrases lapidaires : "L'honorable Louis Stanton, juge fédéral à la cour du district sud de New York, a désigné Lee Richards, du cabinet juridique Richards, Kibbe & Orbe, administrateur judiciaire des avoirs et des comptes de la société Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities. Pour toute question, contacter l'administrateur au 214-647-7511." Là, on tombe sur un répondeur. Une voix indique être "dans l'incapacité de fournir aucune information à l'heure actuelle" et demande aux correspondants de laisser leurs coordonnées. L'administrateur rappellera quand il y aura vu plus clair.


Sylvain Cypel

Le Monde, 18 décembre 2008

Par Charles de La Barre - Publié dans : overreaction
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Dimanche 14 décembre 2008 7 14 /12 /Déc /2008 17:45

(Ces douze étapes sont reprises de l'article en anglais A Practical guide to the hero with a thousand faces).

  1. Le héros dans son monde ordinaire : il s'agit d'une introduction qui fera mieux ressortir le caractère extraordinaire des aventures qui suivront
  2. L'appel à l'aventure, qui se présente comme un problème ou un défi à relever
  3. Le héros est d'abord réticent, il a peur de l'inconnu
  4. Le héros est encouragé par un mentor, vieil homme sage ou autre. Quelquefois le mentor donnera aussi une arme magique, mais il n'accompagnera pas le héros qui doit affronter seul les épreuves.
  5. Le héros passe le « seuil » de l'aventure, il entre dans un monde extraordinaire, il ne peut plus faire demi-tour
  6. Le héros subit des épreuves, rencontre des alliés et des ennemis
  7. Le héros atteint l'endroit le plus dangereux, souvent en profondeur, où l'objet de sa quête est caché
  8. Le héros subit l'épreuve suprême, il affronte la mort
  9. Le héros s'empare de l'objet de sa quête
  10. Le chemin du retour, où parfois il s'agit encore d'échapper à la vengeance de ceux à qui l'objet à été volé
  11. Le héros revient du monde extraordinaire où il s'était aventuré, transformé par l'expérience
  12. Le retour dans le monde ordinaire et l'utilisation de l'objet de la quête pour améliorer le monde (donnant ainsi un sens à l'aventure)
Par Charles de La Barre - Publié dans : overreaction
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Lundi 8 décembre 2008 1 08 /12 /Déc /2008 06:08

Every day for the past 30 years, a performance of Carl Orff's Carmina Burana has taken place somewhere in the world. Few pieces of classical music have achieved such ubiquitous recognition. Its chorus "O Fortuna" has been used to advertise beer, aftershave and horror movies; performers worldwide fall over themselves to tackle the bawdy Latin texts and the panoply of accompanying percussion. In January, the work is coming to London's O2 Arena in a spectacular staging by Franz Abraham, involving 250 performers, naked dancers, fireworks, bungee jumping and more.

The first classical presentation at the O2 Arena, it's also the first time since 1926 that such a vast a classical music event will have been held indoors in the UK – nothing on this scale has been seen since the demise of the Crystal Palace's Handel festivals back in 1926. It is more than 125 years since Messiah was performed there to an audience of 87,000

This production of Carmina Burana has now been touring for 13 years, but this is its first visit to Britain. Those who snort that the 18,000 audience capacity at O2 is too large for classical music would do well to reflect that on Copacabana beach in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, the production played to some 100,000. Indications are that this is more than just an attempt to sex up a classic. The performing ensemble of the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra, the Brighton Festival Chorus and Youth Choir and an outsize company of dancers, actors and puppets will be conducted by Walter Haupt, a former student and friend of the composer, and Abraham has said that on attending the premiere Orff's widow declared that this was what her late husband "had dreamed for his masterpiece".

But now the tormented history of Orff himself has become the subject of a new documentary by Tony Palmer. His film O Fortuna, which premieres at the Barbican in London on Sunday, carries a message no less spectacular in its own way, but far more sober: Carl Orff effectively sold his soul to Hitler's henchmen, and paid the price in his conscience for the rest of his life.

 

The film contains much that will shock fans, as well some phenomenal twists of fortune. Orff emerges as a highly complex man who, according to the third of his four wives, Luise Rinser, "found it impossible to love" and "despised people", habitually using, then discarding those close to him. He would often wake in the night, screaming, and would tell her, "I have seen the Devil." She adds: "If he had been a less great person, he would have gone mad. Nevertheless, there is madness in his music." Orff's only child, Godela, gives a candid account of a father whom she declares did not want her and had no place for her in his existence. But the catalogue of lies, deception and heartlessness goes back to the very beginning.

It turns out that Orff, who was born in Bavaria in 1895, had a Jewish grandmother – a fact that, extraordinarily, he managed to conceal from the painstaking research of the National Socialists. "Once you tell one lie to cover up a lethal situation – one Jewish grandparent was enough to condemn you to death – it's a slippery slope," comments Tony Palmer. "Ever more must be done to maintain the deception."

The lies went on. Orff later claimed that the Nazis had banned Carmina Burana. Nothing could have been further from the truth – they adored it, and no wonder. Its simplicity, accessibility and primal force exemplified the opposite of the atonal or serialist works that the regime deemed "decadent" (entartete musik). Indeed, the work – premiered for the Nazi party in 1937 – helped to draw Orff to their attention and won him support from the Reich. Nor was he above writing new incidental music to A Midsummer Night's Dream when the much-loved work by the Jewish Mendelssohn was banned.

Orff, however, was never a card-carrying member of the Nazi party and privately despised them for their crudity and philistinism. "He wasn't interested in politics," his second wife, Gertrud, recalls in the film. She adds that the war was "not our fault", but that they did not protest because it "wasn't safe".

It is telling that one of the works closest to Orff's heart was a Märchenopera (fairy-tale opera) that he wrote in 1939: Der Mond, telling of a world plunged into darkness when fiends steal the moon. It contains some of his most appealing music, but proved unstageable except by a puppet theatre. Many artists, comments the historian Michael H Kater, felt that "the regime had stolen the light" from them. Still, it was not difficult for the previously penniless and struggling Orff to see that the Reich had high hopes for him. By 1943, his name was on a special list of favoured artists; he was not to be conscripted, he received a 2,000-mark prize from the Cultural Chamber in 1942 and he was placed on an elite payroll that gave him 1,000 marks per month. Germany's two senior composers, Richard Strauss and Hans Pfitzner were ageing and would soon die; it was clear that if Germany were to win the war, Orff would quickly become the Reich's leading composer.

One can argue that, like so many living under insane and tyrannical regimes, Orff merely did what was necessary in order to survive. And perhaps it was his good fortune that when he found himself facing the "de-Nazification" process after Germany's defeat, his interrogator was a musically educated admirer. This American intelligence officer, keen to help him, asked him simply to provide something, anything, that could show he had spoken out against Hitler.

Orff's invented response at this moment would never cease to haunt the composer.

Kurt Huber, professor of philosophy at Munich University, had provided Orff with the medieval Latin texts that he set in Carmina Burana; the two had also worked together on Der Mond. In 1942, Huber and a core group of students formed the White Rose resistance movement which distributed pamphlets calling for active opposition to the Third Reich. Huber authored the sixth and final leaflet. Huber's widow, Clara, relates on camera that Orff was a close friend and used to visit them every Sunday. Yet, she adds, he had no part in the movement and never said a word against Hitler.

On the contrary, the day after Huber's arrest by the Nazis, when she told Orff what had happened, his response was: "I am ruined! Ruined!" She hoped he would use his influence to intervene on her husband's behalf; but Orff did nothing. "He thought only of himself," she recalls. She never saw him again.

Put on the spot by the de-Nazification interrogator, Orff falsely claimed that he had co-founded the White Rose movement with Huber. The group's members, including Huber, had been executed in 1943. Nobody was left alive to dispute his words and he walked out with a clear name. He only had to answer to his conscience.

Among Orff's papers, Michael Kater discovered a document in the composer's handwriting, addressed to the deceased Huber: a letter recalling their good times and begging forgiveness. It appeared to be Orff's private, desperate attempt to work through his guilt over betraying his friend. Perhaps it is no coincidence that Orff's later works included settings of Greek tragedies, for example, Antigonae and Oedipus, in which guilt and the unforgiving nature of fate are recurrent themes.

Orff, though, has experienced an astonishing posthumous redemption. In 1924-1925 he co-founded the Günther-Schule for music and dance in Munich. There, with half an eye on the Hitler Youth, he devised a new approach to musical education entitled Schulwerk – literally, "schoolwork". Its central concept is that every child is musical and that each individual can become free to express him- or herself musically through learning simple rhythms on percussion instruments, playing and singing in groups, and building confidence through imagination and creative thinking. "When we lose our fantasy," said Orff, "we are lost."

The Hitler Youth turned up its nose at Schulwerk. But in time, Orff's ideas proved strikingly effective; today they are passionately advocated by musical educationalists the world over.

Palmer has filmed Orff Schulwerk classes in China, Taiwan, the townships of South Africa and, harrowingly, a music therapy group in Nottingham for children with cerebral palsy. Whatever Orff's personal failings, he devised a system that is now improving the lives of ailing children who, under the Third Reich, would have been condemned to death.

Orff died in 1982 and was buried in the monastery at Andechs on Bavaria's "holy mountain". Fortune may have been merciless to him in his own mind, but in the musical world it has smiled lavishly upon him, and continues to do so. "The good man," said Orff, "is the one who begins again, with his ideas and his life."

Tony Palmer's 'O Fortuna' is at the Barbican Cinema, Silk Street, London EC2 on Sunday at 6pm (020-7638 8891; www.barbican.org.uk). 'Carmina Burana' is at the O2 Arena (0844 856 0202; www.theo2.co.uk) on 17 and 18 January.Media partner: 'The Independent'

Par Charles de La Barre - Publié dans : overreaction
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Samedi 15 novembre 2008 6 15 /11 /Nov /2008 16:31

1.

Baysie Wightman met DeeDee Gordon, appropriately enough, on a coolhunt. It was 1992. Baysie was a big shot for Converse, and DeeDee, who was barely twenty-one, was running a very cool boutique called Placid Planet, on Newbury Street in Boston. Baysie came in with a camera crew-one she often used when she was coolhunting-and said, "I've been watching your store, I've seen you, I've heard you know what's up," because it was Baysie's job at Converse to find people who knew what was up and she thought DeeDee was one of those people. DeeDee says that she responded with reserve-that "I was like, 'Whatever' "-but Baysie said that if DeeDee ever wanted to come and work at Converse she should just call, and nine months later DeeDee called. This was about the time the cool kids had decided they didn't want the hundred-and-twenty- five-dollar basketball sneaker with seventeen different kinds of high-technology materials and colors and air-cushioned heels anymore. They wanted simplicity and authenticity, and Baysie picked up on that. She brought back the Converse One Star, which was a vulcanized, suède, low-top classic old-school sneaker from the nineteen-seventies, and, sure enough, the One Star quickly became the signature shoe of the retro era. Remember what Kurt Cobain was wearing in the famous picture of him lying dead on the ground after committing suicide? Black Converse One Stars. DeeDee's big score was calling the sandal craze. She had been out in Los Angeles and had kept seeing the white teen-age girls dressing up like cholos, Mexican gangsters, in tight white tank tops known as "wife beaters," with a bra strap hanging out, and long shorts and tube socks and shower sandals. DeeDee recalls, "I'm like, 'I'm telling you, Baysie, this is going to hit. There are just too many people wearing it. We have to make a shower sandal.' " So Baysie, DeeDee, and a designer came up with the idea of making a retro sneaker-sandal, cutting the back off the One Star and putting a thick outsole on it. It was huge, and, amazingly, it's still huge.

Today, Baysie works for Reebok as general-merchandise manager-part of the team trying to return Reebok to the position it enjoyed in the mid-nineteen-eighties as the country's hottest sneaker company. DeeDee works for an advertising agency in Del Mar called Lambesis, where she puts out a quarterly tip sheet called the L Report on what the cool kids in major American cities are thinking and doing and buying. Baysie and DeeDee are best friends. They talk on the phone all the time. They get together whenever Baysie is in L.A. (DeeDee: "It's, like, how many times can you drive past O. J. Simpson's house?"), and between them they can talk for hours about the art of the coolhunt. They're the Lewis and Clark of cool.

What they have is what everybody seems to want these days, which is a window on the world of the street. Once, when fashion trends were set by the big couture houses-when cool was trickle- down-that wasn't important. But sometime in the past few decades things got turned over, and fashion became trickle-up. It's now about chase and flight-designers and retailers and the mass consumer giving chase to the elusive prey of street cool-and the rise of coolhunting as a profession shows how serious the chase has become. The sneakers of Nike and Reebok used to come out yearly. Now a new style comes out every season. Apparel designers used to have an eighteen-month lead time between concept and sale. Now they're reducing that to a year, or even six months, in order to react faster to new ideas from the street. The paradox, of course, is that the better coolhunters become at bringing the mainstream close to the cutting edge, the more elusive the cutting edge becomes. This is the first rule of the cool: The quicker the chase, the quicker the flight. The act of discovering what's cool is what causes cool to move on, which explains the triumphant circularity of coolhunting: because we have coolhunters like DeeDee and Baysie, cool changes more quickly, and because cool changes more quickly, we need coolhunters like DeeDee and Baysie.

DeeDee is tall and glamorous, with short hair she has dyed so often that she claims to have forgotten her real color. She drives a yellow 1977 Trans Am with a burgundy stripe down the center and a 1973 Mercedes 450 SL, and lives in a spare, Japanese-style cabin in Laurel Canyon. She uses words like "rad" and "totally," and offers non-stop, deadpan pronouncements on pop culture, as in "It's all about Pee-wee Herman." She sounds at first like a teen, like the same teens who, at Lambesis, it is her job to follow. But teen speech-particularly girl-teen speech, with its fixation on reported speech ("so she goes," "and I'm like," "and he goes") and its stock vocabulary of accompanying grimaces and gestures-is about using language less to communicate than to fit in. DeeDee uses teen speech to set herself apart, and the result is, for lack of a better word, really cool. She doesn't do the teen thing of climbing half an octave at the end of every sentence. Instead, she drags out her vowels for emphasis, so that if she mildly disagreed with something I'd said she would say "Maalcolm" and if she strongly disagreed with what I'd said she would say "Maaalcolm."

Baysie is older, just past forty (although you would never guess that), and went to Exeter and Middlebury and had two grandfathers who went to Harvard (although you wouldn't guess that, either). She has curly brown hair and big green eyes and long legs and so much energy that it is hard to imagine her asleep, or resting, or even standing still for longer than thirty seconds. The hunt for cool is an obsession with her, and DeeDee is the same way. DeeDee used to sit on the corner of West Broadway and Prince in SoHo-back when SoHo was cool-and take pictures of everyone who walked by for an entire hour. Baysie can tell you precisely where she goes on her Reebok coolhunts to find the really cool alternative white kids ("I'd maybe go to Portland and hang out where the skateboarders hang out near that bridge") or which snowboarding mountain has cooler kids-Stratton, in Vermont, or Summit County, in Colorado. (Summit, definitely.) DeeDee can tell you on the basis of the L Report's research exactly how far Dallas is behind New York in coolness (from six to eight months). Baysie is convinced that Los Angeles is not happening right now: "In the early nineteen-nineties a lot more was coming from L.A. They had a big trend with the whole Melrose Avenue look-the stupid goatees, the shorter hair. It was cleaned-up aftergrunge. There were a lot of places you could go to buy vinyl records. It was a strong place to go for looks. Then it went back to being horrible." DeeDee is convinced that Japan is happening: "I linked onto this future-technology thing two years ago. Now look at it, it's huge. It's the whole resurgence of Nike-Nike being larger than life. I went to Japan and saw the kids just bailing the most technologically advanced Nikes with their little dresses and little outfits and I'm like, 'Whoa, this is trippy!' It's performance mixed with fashion. It's really superheavy." Baysie has a theory that Liverpool is cool right now because it's the birthplace of the whole "lad" look, which involves soccer blokes in the pubs going superdressy and wearing Dolce & Gabbana and Polo Sport and Reebok Classics on their feet. But when I asked DeeDee about that, she just rolled her eyes: "Sometimes Baysie goes off on these tangents. Man, I love that woman!"

I used to think that if I talked to Baysie and DeeDee long enough I could write a coolhunting manual, an encyclopedia of cool. But then I realized that the manual would have so many footnotes and caveats that it would be unreadable. Coolhunting is not about the articulation of a coherent philosophy of cool. It's just a collection of spontaneous observations and predictions that differ from one moment to the next and from one coolhunter to the next. Ask a coolhunter where the baggy-jeans look came from, for example, and you might get any number of answers: urban black kids mimicking the jailhouse look, skateboarders looking for room to move, snowboarders trying not to look like skiers, or, alternatively, all three at once, in some grand concordance.

Or take the question of exactly how Tommy Hilfiger-a forty- five-year-old white guy from Greenwich, Connecticut, doing all- American preppy clothes-came to be the designer of choice for urban black America. Some say it was all about the early and visible endorsement given Hilfiger by the hip-hop auteur Grand Puba, who wore a dark-green-and-blue Tommy jacket over a white Tommy T-shirt as he leaned on his black Lamborghini on the cover of the hugely influential "Grand Puba 2000" CD, and whose love for Hilfiger soon spread to other rappers. (Who could forget the rhymes of Mobb Deep? "Tommy was my nigga /And couldn't figure /How me and Hilfiger / used to move through with vigor.") Then I had lunch with one of Hilfiger's designers, a twenty-six-year-old named Ulrich (Ubi) Simpson, who has a Puerto Rican mother and a Dutch-Venezuelan father, plays lacrosse, snowboards, surfs the long board, goes to hip-hop concerts, listens to Jungle, Edith Piaf, opera, rap, and Metallica, and has working with him on his design team a twenty-seven-year-old black guy from Montclair with dreadlocks, a twenty-two-year-old Asian-American who lives on the Lower East Side, a twenty-five-year-old South Asian guy from Fiji, and a twenty-one-year-old white graffiti artist from Queens. That's when it occurred to me that maybe the reason Tommy Hilfiger can make white culture cool to black culture is that he has people working for him who are cool in both cultures simultaneously. Then again, maybe it was all Grand Puba. Who knows?

One day last month, Baysie took me on a coolhunt to the Bronx and Harlem, lugging a big black canvas bag with twenty-four different shoes that Reebok is about to bring out, and as we drove down Fordham Road, she had her head out the window like a little kid, checking out what everyone on the street was wearing. We went to Dr. Jay's, which is the cool place to buy sneakers in the Bronx, and Baysie crouched down on the floor and started pulling the shoes out of her bag one by one, soliciting opinions from customers who gathered around and asking one question after another, in rapid sequence. One guy she listened closely to was maybe eighteen or nineteen, with a diamond stud in his ear and a thin beard. He was wearing a Polo baseball cap, a brown leather jacket, and the big, oversized leather boots that are everywhere uptown right now. Baysie would hand him a shoe and he would hold it, look at the top, and move it up and down and flip it over. The first one he didn't like: "Oh-kay." The second one he hated: he made a growling sound in his throat even before Baysie could give it to him, as if to say, "Put it back in the bag-now!" But when she handed him a new DMX RXT-a low-cut run/walk shoe in white and blue and mesh with a translucent "ice" sole, which retails for a hundred and ten dollars-he looked at it long and hard and shook his head in pure admiration and just said two words, dragging each of them out: "No doubt."

Baysie was interested in what he was saying, because the DMX RXT she had was a girls' shoe that actually hadn't been doing all that well. Later, she explained to me that the fact that the boys loved the shoe was critical news, because it suggested that Reebok had a potential hit if it just switched the shoe to the men's section. How she managed to distill this piece of information from the crowd of teenagers around her, how she made any sense of the two dozen shoes in her bag, most of which (to my eyes, anyway) looked pretty much the same, and how she knew which of the teens to really focus on was a mystery. Baysie is a Wasp from New England, and she crouched on the floor in Dr. Jay's for almost an hour, talking and joking with the homeboys without a trace of condescension or self-consciousness.

Near the end of her visit, a young boy walked up and sat down on the bench next to her. He was wearing a black woollen cap with white stripes pulled low, a blue North Face pleated down jacket, a pair of baggy Guess jeans, and, on his feet, Nike Air Jordans. He couldn't have been more than thirteen. But when he started talking you could see Baysie's eyes light up, because somehow she knew the kid was the real thing.

"How many pairs of shoes do you buy a month?" Baysie asked.

"Two," the kid answered. "And if at the end I find one more I like I get to buy that, too."

Baysie was onto him. "Does your mother spoil you?"

The kid blushed, but a friend next to him was laughing. "Whatever he wants, he gets."

Baysie laughed, too. She had the DMX RXT in his size. He tried them on. He rocked back and forth, testing them. He looked back at Baysie. He was dead serious now: "Make sure these come out."

Baysie handed him the new "Rush" Emmitt Smith shoe due out in the fall. One of the boys had already pronounced it "phat," and another had looked through the marbleized-foam cradle in the heel and cried out in delight, "This is bug!" But this kid was the acid test, because this kid knew cool. He paused. He looked at it hard. "Reebok," he said, soberly and carefully, "is trying to get butter."

In the car on the way back to Manhattan, Baysie repeated it twice. "Not better. Butter! That kid could totally tell you what he thinks." Baysie had spent an hour coolhunting in a shoe store and found out that Reebok's efforts were winning the highest of hip-hop praise. "He was so fucking smart."

2.

If you want to understand how trends work, and why coolhunters like Baysie and DeeDee have become so important, a good place to start is with what's known as diffusion research, which is the study of how ideas and innovations spread. Diffusion researchers do things like spending five years studying the adoption of irrigation techniques in a Colombian mountain village, or developing complex matrices to map the spread of new math in the Pittsburgh school system. What they do may seem like a far cry from, say, how the Tommy Hilfiger thing spread from Harlem to every suburban mall in the country, but it really isn't: both are about how new ideas spread from one person to the next.

One of the most famous diffusion studies is Bruce Ryan and Neal Gross's analysis of the spread of hybrid seed corn in Greene County, Iowa, in the nineteen-thirties. The new seed corn was introduced there in about 1928, and it was superior in every respect to the seed that had been used by farmers for decades. But it wasn't adopted all at once. Of two hundred and fifty-nine farmers studied by Ryan and Gross, only a handful had started planting the new seed by 1933. In 1934, sixteen took the plunge. In 1935, twenty-one more followed; the next year, there were thirty-six, and the year after that a whopping sixty-one. The succeeding figures were then forty-six, thirty-six, fourteen, and three, until, by 1941, all but two of the two hundred and fifty-nine farmers studied were using the new seed. In the language of diffusion research, the handful of farmers who started trying hybrid seed corn at the very beginning of the thirties were the "innovators," the adventurous ones. The slightly larger group that followed them was the "early adopters." They were the opinion leaders in the community, the respected, thoughtful people who watched and analyzed what those wild innovators were doing and then did it themselves. Then came the big bulge of farmers in 1936, 1937, and 1938-the "early majority" and the "late majority," which is to say the deliberate and the skeptical masses, who would never try anything until the most respected farmers had tried it. Only after they had been converted did the "laggards," the most traditional of all, follow suit. The critical thing about this sequence is that it is almost entirely interpersonal. According to Ryan and Gross, only the innovators relied to any great extent on radio advertising and farm journals and seed salesmen in making their decision to switch to the hybrid. Everyone else made his decision overwhelmingly because of the example and the opinions of his neighbors and peers.

Isn't this just how fashion works? A few years ago, the classic brushed-suède Hush Puppies with the lightweight crêpe sole-the moc-toe oxford known as the Duke and the slip-on with the golden buckle known as the Columbia-were selling barely sixty-five thousand pairs a year. The company was trying to walk away from the whole suède casual look entirely. It wanted to do "aspirational" shoes: "active casuals" in smooth leather, like the Mall Walker, with a Comfort Curve technology outsole and a heel stabilizer-the kind of shoes you see in Kinney's for $39.95. But then something strange started happening. Two Hush Puppies executives-Owen Baxter and Jeff Lewis-were doing a fashion shoot for their Mall Walkers and ran into a creative consultant from Manhattan named Jeffrey Miller, who informed them that the Dukes and the Columbias weren't dead, they were dead chic. "We were being told," Baxter recalls, "that there were areas in the Village, in SoHo, where the shoes were selling-in resale shops-and that people were wearing the old Hush Puppies. They were going to the ma-and-pa stores, the little stores that still carried them, and there was this authenticity of being able to say, 'I am wearing an original pair of Hush Puppies.' "

Baxter and Lewis-tall, solid, fair-haired Midwestern guys with thick, shiny wedding bands-are shoe men, first and foremost. Baxter was working the cash register at his father's shoe store in Mount Prospect, Illinois, at the age of thirteen. Lewis was doing inventory in his father's shoe store in Pontiac, Michigan, at the age of seven. Baxter was in the National Guard during the 1968 Democratic Convention, in Chicago, and was stationed across the street from the Conrad Hilton downtown, right in the middle of things. Today, the two men work out of Rockford, Michigan (population thirty-eight hundred), where Hush Puppies has been making the Dukes and the Columbias in an old factory down by the Rogue River for almost forty years. They took me to the plant when I was in Rockford. In a crowded, noisy, low-slung building, factory workers stand in long rows, gluing, stapling, and sewing together shoes in dozens of bright colors, and the two executives stopped at each production station and described it in detail. Lewis and Baxter know shoes. But they would be the first to admit that they don't know cool. "Miller was saying that there is something going on with the shoes-that Isaac Mizrahi was wearing the shoes for his personal use," Lewis told me. We were seated around the conference table in the Hush Puppies headquarters in Rockford, with the snow and the trees outside and a big water tower behind us. "I think it's fair to say that at the time we had no idea who Isaac Mizrahi was."

By late 1994, things had begun to happen in a rush. First, the designer John Bartlett called. He wanted to use Hush Puppies as accessories in his spring collection. Then Anna Sui called. Miller, the man from Manhattan, flew out to Michigan to give advice on a new line ("Of course, packing my own food and thinking about 'Fargo' in the corner of my mind"). A few months later, in Los Angeles, the designer Joel Fitzpatrick put a twenty-five-foot inflatable basset hound on the roof of his store on La Brea Avenue and gutted his adjoining art gallery to turn it into a Hush Puppies department, and even before he opened-while he was still painting and putting up shelves-Pee-wee Herman walked in and asked for a couple of pairs. Pee-wee Herman! "It was total word of mouth. I didn't even have a sign back then," Fitzpatrick recalls. In 1995, the company sold four hundred and thirty thousand pairs of the classic Hush Puppies. In 1996, it sold a million six hundred thousand, and that was only scratching the surface, because in Europe and the rest of the world, where Hush Puppies have a huge following-where they might outsell the American market four to one-the revival was just beginning.

The cool kids who started wearing old Dukes and Columbias from thrift shops were the innovators. Pee-wee Herman, wandering in off the street, was an early adopter. The million six hundred thousand people who bought Hush Puppies last year are the early majority, jumping in because the really cool people have already blazed the trail. Hush Puppies are moving through the country just the way hybrid seed corn moved through Greene County-all of which illustrates what coolhunters can and cannot do. If Jeffrey Miller had been wrong-if cool people hadn't been digging through the thrift shops for Hush Puppies-and he had arbitrarily decided that Baxter and Lewis should try to convince non-cool people that the shoes were cool, it wouldn't have worked. You can't convince the late majority that Hush Puppies are cool, because the late majority makes its coolness decisions on the basis of what the early majority is doing, and you can't convince the early majority, because the early majority is looking at the early adopters, and you can't convince the early adopters, because they take their cues from the innovators. The innovators do get their cool ideas from people other than their peers, but the fact is that they are the last people who can be convinced by a marketing campaign that a pair of suède shoes is cool. These are, after all, the people who spent hours sifting through thrift-store bins. And why did they do that? Because their definition of cool is doing something that nobody else is doing. A company can intervene in the cool cycle. It can put its shoes on really cool celebrities and on fashion runways and on MTV. It can accelerate the transition from the innovator to the early adopter and on to the early majority. But it can't just manufacture cool out of thin air, and that's the second rule of cool.

At the peak of the Hush Puppies craziness last year, Hush Puppies won the prize for best accessory at the Council of Fashion Designers' awards dinner, at Lincoln Center. The award was accepted by the Hush Puppies president, Louis Dubrow, who came out wearing a pair of custom-made black patent-leather Hush Puppies and stood there blinking and looking at the assembled crowd as if it were the last scene of "Close Encounters of the Third Kind." It was a strange moment. There was the president of the Hush Puppies company, of Rockford, Michigan, population thirty-eight hundred, sharing a stage with Calvin Klein and Donna Karan and Isaac Mizrahi-and all because some kids in the East Village began combing through thrift shops for old Dukes. Fashion was at the mercy of those kids, whoever they were, and it was a wonderful thing if the kids picked you, but a scary thing, too, because it meant that cool was something you could not control. You needed someone to find cool and tell you what it was.

3.

When Baysie Wightman went to Dr. Jay's, she was looking for customer response to the new shoes Reebok had planned for the fourth quarter of 1997 and the first quarter of 1998. This kind of customer testing is critical at Reebok, because the last decade has not been kind to the company. In 1987, it had a third of the American athletic-shoe market, well ahead of Nike. Last year, it had sixteen per cent. "The kid in the store would say, 'I'd like this shoe if your logo wasn't on it,' " E. Scott Morris, who's a senior designer for Reebok, told me. "That's kind of a punch in the mouth. But we've all seen it. You go into a shoe store. The kid picks up the shoe and says, 'Ah, man, this is nice.' He turns the shoe around and around. He looks at it underneath. He looks at the side and he goes, 'Ah, this is Reebok,' and says, 'I ain't buying this,' and puts the shoe down and walks out. And you go, 'You was just digging it a minute ago. What happened?' " Somewhere along the way, the company lost its cool, and Reebok now faces the task not only of rebuilding its image but of making the shoes so cool that the kids in the store can't put them down.

Every few months, then, the company's coolhunters go out into the field with prototypes of the upcoming shoes to find out what kids really like, and come back to recommend the necessary changes. The prototype of one recent Emmitt Smith shoe, for example, had a piece of molded rubber on the end of the tongue as a design element; it was supposed to give the shoe a certain "richness," but the kids said they thought it looked overbuilt. Then Reebok gave the shoes to the Boston College football team for wear-testing, and when they got the shoes back they found out that all the football players had cut out the rubber component with scissors. As messages go, this was hard to miss. The tongue piece wasn't cool, and on the final version of the shoe it was gone. The rule of thumb at Reebok is that if the kids in Chicago, New York, and Detroit all like a shoe, it's a guaranteed hit. More than likely, though, the coolhunt is going to turn up subtle differences from city to city, so that once the coolhunters come back the designers have to find out some way to synthesize what was heard, and pick out just those things that all the kids seemed to agree on. In New York, for example, kids in Harlem are more sophisticated and fashion-forward than kids in the Bronx, who like things a little more colorful and glitzy. Brooklyn, meanwhile, is conservative and preppy, more like Washington, D.C. For reasons no one really knows, Reeboks are coolest in Philadelphia. In Philly, in fact, the Reebok Classics are so huge they are known simply as National Anthems, as in "I'll have a pair of blue Anthems in nine and a half." Philadelphia is Reebok's innovator town. From there trends move along the East Coast, trickling all the way to Charlotte, North Carolina.

Reebok has its headquarters in Stoughton, Massachusetts, outside Boston-in a modern corporate park right off Route 24. There are basketball and tennis courts next to the building, and a health club on the ground floor that you can look directly into from the parking lot. The front lobby is adorned with shrines for all of Reebok's most prominent athletes-shrines complete with dramatic action photographs, their sports jerseys, and a pair of their signature shoes-and the halls are filled with so many young, determinedly athletic people that when I visited Reebok headquarters I suddenly wished I'd packed my gym clothes in case someone challenged me to wind sprints. At Stoughton, I met with a handful of the company's top designers and marketing executives in a long conference room on the third floor. In the course of two hours, they put one pair of shoes after another on the table in front of me, talking excitedly about each sneaker's prospects, because the feeling at Reebok is that things are finally turning around. The basketball shoe that Reebok brought out last winter for Allen Iverson, the star rookie guard for the Philadelphia 76ers, for example, is one of the hottest shoes in the country. Dr. Jay's sold out of Iversons in two days, compared with the week it took the store to sell out of Nike's new Air Jordans. Iverson himself is brash and charismatic and faster from foul line to foul line than anyone else in the league. He's the equivalent of those kids in the East Village who began wearing Hush Puppies way back when. He's an innovator, and the hope at Reebok is that if he gets big enough the whole company can ride back to coolness on his coattails, the way Nike rode to coolness on the coattails of Michael Jordan. That's why Baysie was so excited when the kid said Reebok was trying to get butter when he looked at the Rush and the DMX RXT: it was a sign, albeit a small one, that the indefinable, abstract thing called cool was coming back.

When Baysie comes back from a coolhunt, she sits down with marketing experts and sales representatives and designers, and reconnects them to the street, making sure they have the right shoes going to the right places at the right price. When she got back from the Bronx, for example, the first thing she did was tell all these people they had to get a new men's DMX RXT out, fast, because the kids on the street loved the women's version. "It's hotter than we realized," she told them. The coolhunter's job in this instance is very specific. What DeeDee does, on the other hand, is a little more ambitious. With the L Report, she tries to construct a kind of grand matrix of cool, comprising not just shoes but everything kids like, and not just kids of certain East Coast urban markets but kids all over. DeeDee and her staff put it out four times a year, in six different versions-for New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Austin-Dallas, Seattle, and Chicago-and then sell it to manufacturers, retailers, and ad agencies (among others) for twenty thousand dollars a year. They go to each city and find the coolest bars and clubs, and ask the coolest kids to fill out questionnaires. The information is then divided into six categories-You Saw It Here First, Entertainment and Leisure, Clothing and Accessories, Personal and Individual, Aspirations, and Food and Beverages-which are, in turn, broken up into dozens of subcategories, so that Personal and Individual, for example, includes Cool Date, Cool Evening, Free Time, Favorite Possession, and on and on. The information in those subcategories is subdivided again by sex and by age bracket (14-18, 19-24, 25-30), and then, as a control, the L Report gives you the corresponding set of preferences for "mainstream" kids.

Few coolhunters bother to analyze trends with this degree of specificity. DeeDee's biggest competitor, for example, is something called the Hot Sheet, out of Manhattan. It uses a panel of three thousand kids a year from across the country and divides up their answers by sex and age, but it doesn't distinguish between regions, or between trendsetting and mainstream respondents. So what you're really getting is what all kids think is cool-not what cool kids think is cool, which is a considerably different piece of information. Janine Misdom and Joanne DeLuca, who run the Sputnik coolhunting group out of the garment district in Manhattan, meanwhile, favor an entirely impressionistic approach, sending out coolhunters with video cameras to talk to kids on the ground that it's too difficult to get cool kids to fill out questionnaires. Once, when I was visiting the Sputnik girls-as Misdom and DeLuca are known on the street, because they look alike and their first names are so similar and both have the same awesome New York accents-they showed me a video of the girl they believe was the patient zero of the whole eighties revival going on right now. It was back in September of 1993. Joanne and Janine were on Seventh Avenue, outside the Fashion Institute of Technology, doing random street interviews for a major jeans company, and, quite by accident, they ran into this nineteen-year- old raver. She had close-cropped hair, which was green at the top, and at the temples was shaved even closer and dyed pink. She had rings and studs all over her face, and a thick collection of silver tribal jewelry around her neck, and vintage jeans. She looked into the camera and said, "The sixties came in and then the seventies came in and I think it's ready to come back to the eighties. It's totally eighties: the eye makeup, the clothes. It's totally going back to that." Immediately, Joanne and Janine started asking around. "We talked to a few kids on the Lower East Side who said they were feeling the need to start breaking out their old Michael Jackson jackets," Joanne said. "They were joking about it. They weren't doing it yet. But they were going to, you know? They were saying, 'We're getting the urge to break out our Members Only jackets.' " That was right when Joanne and Janine were just starting up; calling the eighties revival was their first big break, and now they put out a full-blown videotaped report twice a year which is a collection of clips of interviews with extremely progressive people.

What DeeDee argues, though, is that cool is too subtle and too variegated to be captured with these kind of broad strokes. Cool is a set of dialects, not a language. The L Report can tell you, for example, that nineteen-to-twenty-four-year-old male trendsetters in Seattle would most like to meet, among others, King Solomon and Dr. Seuss, and that nineteen-to-twenty-four-year- old female trendsetters in San Francisco have turned their backs on Calvin Klein, Nintendo Gameboy, and sex. What's cool right now? Among male New York trendsetters: North Face jackets, rubber and latex, khakis, and the rock band Kiss. Among female trendsetters: ska music, old-lady clothing, and cyber tech. In Chicago, snowboarding is huge among trendsetters of both sexes and all ages. Women over nineteen are into short hair, while those in their teens have embraced mod culture, rock climbing, tag watches, and bootleg pants. In Austin-Dallas, meanwhile, twenty-five-to- thirty-year-old women trendsetters are into hats, heroin, computers, cigars, Adidas, and velvet, while men in their twenties are into video games and hemp. In all, the typical L Report runs over one hundred pages. But with that flood of data comes an obsolescence disclaimer: "The fluctuating nature of the trendsetting market makes keeping up with trends a difficult task." By the spring, in other words, everything may have changed.

The key to coolhunting, then, is to look for cool people first and cool things later, and not the other way around. Since cool things are always changing, you can't look for them, because the very fact they are cool means you have no idea what to look for. What you would be doing is thinking back on what was cool before and extrapolating, which is about as useful as presuming that because the Dow rose ten points yesterday it will rise another ten points today. Cool people, on the other hand, are a constant.

When I was in California, I met Salvador Barbier, who had been described to me by a coolhunter as "the Michael Jordan of skateboarding." He was tall and lean and languid, with a cowboy's insouciance, and we drove through the streets of Long Beach at fifteen miles an hour in a white late-model Ford Mustang, a car he had bought as a kind of ironic status gesture ("It would look good if I had a Polo jacket or maybe Nautica," he said) to go with his '62 Econoline van and his '64 T-bird. Sal told me that he and his friends, who are all in their mid-twenties, recently took to dressing up as if they were in eighth grade again and gathering together-having a "rally"-on old BMX bicycles in front of their local 7-Eleven. "I'd wear muscle shirts, like Def Leppard or Foghat or some old heavy-metal band, and tight, tight tapered Levi's, and Vans on my feet-big, like, checkered Vans or striped Vans or camouflage Vans-and then wristbands and gloves with the fingers cut off. It was total eighties fashion. You had to look like that to participate in the rally. We had those denim jackets with patches on the back and combs that hung out the back pocket. We went without I.D.s, because we'd have to have someone else buy us beers." At this point, Sal laughed. He was driving really slowly and staring straight ahead and talking in a low drawl-the coolhunter's dream. "We'd ride to this bar and I'd have to carry my bike inside, because we have really expensive bikes, and when we got inside people would freak out. They'd say, 'Omigod,' and I was asking them if they wanted to go for a ride on the handlebars. They were like, 'What is wrong with you. My boyfriend used to dress like that in the eighth grade!' And I was like, 'He was probably a lot cooler then, too.' "

This is just the kind of person DeeDee wants. "I'm looking for somebody who is an individual, who has definitely set himself apart from everybody else, who doesn't look like his peers. I've run into trendsetters who look completely Joe Regular Guy. I can see Joe Regular Guy at a club listening to some totally hardcore band playing, and I say to myself 'Omigod, what's that guy doing here?' and that totally intrigues me, and I have to walk up to him and say, 'Hey, you're really into this band. What's up?' You know what I mean? I look at everything. If I see Joe Regular Guy sitting in a coffee shop and everyone around him has blue hair, I'm going to gravitate toward him, because, hey, what's Joe Regular Guy doing in a coffee shop with people with blue hair?"

We were sitting outside the Fred Segal store in West Hollywood. I was wearing a very conservative white Brooks Brothers button-down and a pair of Levi's, and DeeDee looked first at my shirt and then my pants and dissolved into laughter: "I mean, I might even go up to you in a cool place."

Picking the right person is harder than it sounds, though. Piney Kahn, who works for DeeDee, says, "There are a lot of people in the gray area. You've got these kids who dress ultra funky and have their own style. Then you realize they're just running after their friends." The trick is not just to be able to tell who is different but to be able to tell when that difference represents something truly cool. It's a gut thing. You have to somehow just know. DeeDee hired Piney because Piney clearly knows: she is twenty-four and used to work with the Beastie Boys and has the formidable self-possession of someone who is not only cool herself but whose parents were cool. "I mean," she says, "they named me after a tree."

Piney and DeeDee said that they once tried to hire someone as a coolhunter who was not, himself, cool, and it was a disaster.

"You can give them the boundaries," Piney explained. "You can say that if people shop at Banana Republic and listen to Alanis Morissette they're probably not trendsetters. But then they might go out and assume that everyone who does that is not a trendsetter, and not look at the other things."

"I mean, I myself might go into Banana Republic and buy a T-shirt," DeeDee chimed in.

Their non-cool coolhunter just didn't have that certain instinct, that sense that told him when it was O.K. to deviate from the manual. Because he wasn't cool, he didn't know cool, and that's the essence of the third rule of cool: you have to be one to know one. That's why Baysie is still on top of this business at forty-one. "It's easier for me to tell you what kid is cool than to tell you what things are cool," she says. But that's all she needs to know. In this sense, the third rule of cool fits perfectly into the second: the second rule says that cool cannot be manufactured, only observed, and the third says that it can only be observed by those who are themselves cool. And, of course, the first rule says that it cannot accurately be observed at all, because the act of discovering cool causes cool to take flight, so if you add all three together they describe a closed loop, the hermeneutic circle of coolhunting, a phenomenon whereby not only can the uncool not see cool but cool cannot even be adequately described to them. Baysie says that she can see a coat on one of her friends and think it's not cool but then see the same coat on DeeDee and think that it is cool. It is not possible to be cool, in other words, unless you are-in some larger sense-already cool, and so the phenomenon that the uncool cannot see and cannot have described to them is also something that they cannot ever attain, because if they did it would no longer be cool. Coolhunting represents the ascendancy, in the marketplace, of high school.

Once, I was visiting DeeDee at her house in Laurel Canyon when one of her L Report assistants, Jonas Vail, walked in. He'd just come back from Niketown on Wilshire Boulevard, where he'd bought seven hundred dollars' worth of the latest sneakers to go with the three hundred dollars' worth of skateboard shoes he'd bought earlier in the afternoon. Jonas is tall and expressionless, with a peacoat, dark jeans, and short-cropped black hair. "Jonas is good," DeeDee says. "He works with me on everything. That guy knows more pop culture. You know: What was the name of the store Mrs. Garrett owned on 'The Facts of Life'? He knows all the names of the extras from eighties sitcoms. I can't believe someone like him exists. He's fucking unbelievable. Jonas can spot a cool person a mile away."

Jonas takes the boxes of shoes and starts unpacking them on the couch next to DeeDee. He picks up a pair of the new Nike ACG hiking boots, and says, "All the Japanese in Niketown were really into these." He hands the shoes to DeeDee.

"Of course they were!" she says. "The Japanese are all into the tech-looking shit. Look how exaggerated it is, how bulbous." DeeDee has very ambivalent feelings about Nike, because she thinks its marketing has got out of hand. When she was in the New York Niketown with a girlfriend recently, she says, she started getting light-headed and freaked out. "It's cult, cult, cult. It was like, 'Hello, are we all drinking the Kool-Aid here?' " But this shoe she loves. It's Dr. Jay's in the Bronx all over again. DeeDee turns the shoe around and around in the air, tapping the big clear-blue plastic bubble on the side-the visible Air-Sole unit- with one finger. "It's so fucking rad. It looks like a platypus!" In front of me, there is a pair of Nike's new shoes for the basketball player Jason Kidd.

I pick it up. "This looks . . . cool," I venture uncertainly.

DeeDee is on the couch, where she's surrounded by shoeboxes and sneakers and white tissue paper, and she looks up reprovingly because, of course, I don't get it. I can't get it. "Beyooond cool, Maalcolm. Beyooond cool."

Malcom McDowel, The New-Yorker, 1997

home the new yorker archive top

 

Par Charles de La Barre - Publié dans : overreaction
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Samedi 15 novembre 2008 6 15 /11 /Nov /2008 16:28
Qui tire les câbles du cyberespace ?
LE MONDE 2 | 14.11.08 | 18h16  •  Mis à jour le 14.11.08 | 18h26

in janvier 2008, deux câbles sous-marins, qui assurent l'essentiel du trafic Internet entre l'Europe et l'Asie, sont sectionnés en mer Méditerranée. La troublante simultanéité des coupures alimente aussitôt des théories de complot plus ou moins farfelues, évoquant parfois l'implication du gouvernement américain, en froid avec le régime iranien. Mais l'enquête est classée de manière plus prosaïque : selon les autorités de Dubaï, deux ancres de cargos sont responsables.

 

Il est vrai que les cas de rupture de câbles Internet ne sont pas rares au fond des océans. Selon l'entreprise Global Marine Systems, cinquante opérations de réparation ont lieu chaque année, rien que dans l'océan Atlantique. Mais les deux coupures successives au large des côtes égyptiennes ont eu un écho inattendu. Plus de 70 % des connexions Internet sont aussitôt interrompues en Egypte. Simultanément, l'Inde perd 40 % à 50 % de sa capacité réseau. L'onde de choc virtuelle aura également été ressentie dans toute la péninsule arabique et il faudra plus de dix jours pour que les opérateurs de la région rétablissent la situation.

"Il y a encore cinq ou dix ans, personne n'aurait relevé un tel événement, souligne Sami Al Basheer Al Morshid, directeur du bureau développement de l'Union internationale des télécommunications (UIT), basée à Genève. Ce qui s'est passé au Moyen-Orient démontre la nécessité d'avoir des circuits de connexion alternatifs" Car Internet, nouveau cordon ombilical des sociétés numériques, relie inégalement les habitants du globe. Une inégalité flagrante si l'on étudie la position des principaux câbles, les "backbones", épine dorsale du réseau : plus de 1,5 million de kilomètres de câbles sur toute la surface du globe.

Disparités numériques

De fait, la cartographie du cyberespace reproduit étonnamment les disparités économiques de notre monde réel. Avec un débit de 3 térabits par seconde, la liaison transatlantique, la plus dense, représente 60 % du trafic total. Une quinzaine de câbles contribuent à offrir aux Américains et aux Européens un maillage imposant, gage d'une navigation de qualité. Des pays numériquement émergents, tels la Chine, l'Inde ou le Pakistan, sont plutôt bien dotés. A l'inverse, l'Afrique se distingue par l'atrophie de ses structures. Selon le dernier rapport annuel du cabinet d'études Terabit Consulting, 46 milliards de dollars ont été investis en vingt ans dans le monde, depuis la pose du premier câble de fibre optique en 1988, le TAT-8. Durant cette même période, seuls 934 millions de dollars (2 % des investissements) ont été dépensés en Afrique subsaharienne pour les infrastructures du réseau. De l'Afrique du Sud jusqu'à Djibouti, aucune liaison structurante ne longe les 7 000 kilomètres de côtes. Seul le câble Sat-3, posé en 2002, parcourt l'Afrique du nord-ouest au sud.

Sur le continent américain, au contraire, les principales villes américaines, comme New York ou Los Angeles, constituent autant de "cybercentres", véritables carrefours des réseaux numériques. Mais la géographie d'Internet n'est pas un simple calque de la géographie économique, et le réseau produit aussi ses propres points de convergence : les quelque 175 000 habitants de l'île de Guam, rattachée aux Etats-Unis, disposent par exemple de débits bien supérieurs à leurs besoins, le territoire constituant un point de passage entre les Etats-Unis et l'Asie.

Les lois du marché

Comment de tels contrastes s'expliquent-ils ? L'expansion du réseau s'inscrit d'abord historiquement dans le sillage des infrastructures téléphoniques installées à la fin du xixe siècle, surtout aux Etats-Unis et en Europe. Par ailleurs, l'extension d'Internet a été très rapide. A partir de 1995, il cesse d'être un outil réservé aux militaires ou aux scientifiques, et entre dans l'ère commerciale. Dès lors, tout est à conquérir pour les investisseurs, soucieux d'attirer une clientèle de masse pour leurs infrastructures. La cartographie actuelle du réseau mondial est le signe d'un espace aménagé par les lois du marché et le paradigme du libéralisme mondialisé. Les Etats-Unis, d'où part l'essentiel des liaisons structurantes, sont le cœur du réseau.

Verizon, AT&T, Sprint ou Level : ces noms sont moins connus, surtout en France, que Google, Microsoft ou Yahoo. Mais ces entreprises, que l'expert géographe américain Edward J. Malecki surnomme les "vieux garçons" des réseaux, qui ont investi entre 60 000 et 70 000 euros par kilomètre de câble déroulé, sont en situation de quasi-monopole sur les principales autoroutes de l'information. "En regard des profits espérés, investir n'est pas cher et la maintenance est peu coûteuse, analyse Gilles Puel, maître de conférences en géographie à l'université de Toulouse. Certes, les prix baissent depuis 2000 ; mais comme le volume du trafic explose (avec la téléphonie par Internet [VOIP] et les nouveaux usages), les profits sont très importants. Selon une estimation, le prix de revient d'un appel est de 0,000001 dollar. Comparé au coût de facturation, cela donne le vertige", commente-t-il.

Fourches Caudines

Grand opérateur européen, le français Orange passe pourtant sous les fourches Caudines des opérateurs américains. "Nous sommes connectés à tous ces réseaux, puisqu'une partie importante du trafic des pays Orange va de et vers les Etats-Unis", explique Didier Duriez, directeur des réseaux internationaux d'Orange. Mais grâce à ses filiales, l'entreprise française assure aussi une part importante de la connexion des pays en développement. Or, dans la plupart des pays africains, les coûts de la bande passante atteignent des sommets : jusqu'à quarante fois le prix pratiqué aux Etats-Unis. "Certes, la capacité des câbles sous-marins entre en jeu, mais l'élément-clé dans la constitution du prix est le coût de l'infrastructure domestique des pays africains qui, très souvent, ne baisse pas", se défend M. Duriez.

Pour les régions situées loin de l'épicentre américain, les coûts de connexion sont exorbitants. En 1999, l'Australie estime que la zone Asie-Pacifique doit verser 5 milliards de dollars par an aux opérateurs américains, à cause de son éloignement de la plaque continentale américaine. Pour l'Afrique, le chiffre est estimé à 500 millions de dollars par an.

Loin de la philosophie du Web 2.0 et du partage des ressources "peer to peer", c'est-à-dire d'égal à égal, Internet est devenu un bien largement privé, organisé de manière pyramidale, dont le sommet, soit les infrastructures, est détenu par une poignée de conglomérats. "Les grandes multinationales comme Verizon et AT&T ont un grand avantage : elles ne paient rien, puisqu'elles s'échangent les données, étant du même rang. Elles font ensuite payer les entreprises de rang inférieur", explique Gilles Puel. Car les fournisseurs d'accès, pour satisfaire les internautes en aval de la chaîne de l'information, doivent se connecter aux autoroutes principales. Et plus ils en sont éloignés, plus le tarif que demandent les "vieux garçons" est élevé. Parallèlement, le secteur public, pris dans des difficultés d'échelle, peine à imposer aux opérateurs une logique d'accès à tous au réseau : "Au-dessus de l'Etat, il n'y a rien. En dessous, ça n'a pas de sens, c'est trop petit. Ce sont des logiques trop vastes. Les organismes internationaux sont rapidement limités et se lancent en fonction d'autres objectifs que de réduire la fracture numérique. La faim dans le monde ou la lutte contre les épidémies sont prioritaires. Les actions internationales étaient sous-tendues par des objectifs de ce genre. L'action américaine sur l'Afrique s'est faite en échange de l'abandon par chaque pays de son monopole et de l'ouverture à la concurrence ", explique Gabriel Dupuy, directeur du Centre de recherche sur les réseaux, l'industrie et l'aménagement (CRIA).

Nouveaux acteurs

Pourtant, de nouveaux acteurs pointent le bout de leur fibre : après de multiples retards, la construction du câble EASSy (Eastern Africa Submarine System) a commencé en mars 2008. Financé par la banque mondiale, ce nouveau tracé de 10 000 kilomètres pour un coût de 300 millions de dollars desservira à partir du premier semestre 2010 plus de 250 millions de personnes réparties dans les 21 pays d'Afrique de l'est et australe. Mais le "dernier kilomètre", situé sur les terres et géré par les opérateurs locaux, reste crucial et souvent problématique. Problème de coût, mais aussi politique, les gouvernants n'ayant pas de réelle volonté d'ouvrir le réseau à tous. Alors, en attendant que l'on s'intéresse plus à eux, les Africains continuent dans la débrouille. On voit émerger "des utilisations collectives, semi-collectives voire informelles pour ne pas dire pirates", commente Gabriel Dupuy. De petites antennes satellites collectives de fabrication artisanale fleurissent un peu partout sur le continent, offrant un accès plus ou moins stable au savoir et à l'information, pour un coût partagé, donc plus abordable.

De son côté, Google, le géant touche-à-tout de l'Internet, a compris que la maîtrise des dorsales et tuyaux-maîtres permet une mainmise encore plus affirmée sur le réseau dans son ensemble. Un consortium de six multinationales, parmi lesquelles Google, mais aussi Bharti Airtel (Inde), Global Transit (Malaisie), KDDI (Japon), Pacnet (Hongkong), SingTel (Singapour), s'est donc lancé dans la construction d'Unity, un câble optique long de 10 000 kilomètres qui reliera le Japon (Chikura) aux Etats-Unis (Los Angeles). Pour un coût de 300 millions de dollars, ce nouveau brin augmentera le maillage du réseau transpacifique de plus de 20 % à l'horizon 2010, pour se ramifier à chaque extrémité. Mais, selon Eric Schoonover, analyste du cabinet d'études TeleGeography, interrogé par le magazine Wired.com, "l'implication de Google semble, en augmentant l'offre, n'être qu'une tentative pour faire baisser les coûts de circulation des informations dans ces câbles". Un coup de bluff, en somme.

TeleGeography affirme cependant dans sa dernière étude, parue en mars 2008, qu'au moins 25 nouvelles liaisons seront construites dans les deux ans à venir, pour environ 6,4 milliards de dollars. Une nouvelle ère d'investissements dans les liaisons sous-marines vient de débuter, plus de sept ans après la première vague de maillage intensif. Après les grandes connexions intercontinentales, ce sont les marchés régionaux qui intéressent nos "vieux garçons". Il semblerait que, les liaisons transatlantiques étant déjà pourvues, les principales plaques continentales soient les nouveaux terrains d'investissement des multinationales des télécommunications.

La fin de l'hégémonie américaine ?

Il aura donc fallu "plus de cent ans pour que les télécommunications atteignent un milliard d'utilisateurs à travers le monde et moins de cinq ans pour atteindre le second milliard, essentiellement au moyen de la téléphonie mobile. Quelle sera la recette pour atteindre le troisième milliard d'usagers des technologies de l'information et de la télécommunication ?", s'interroge l'Union internationale des télécommunications. Les flux transpacifiques augmentent fortement (+60 % entre 2002 et 2007) alors que, dans le même temps, les flux transatlantiques restent stables.

Cette hégémonie américaine des flux via l'épine dorsale du réseau se réduit donc au fur et à mesure de l'augmentation du trafic, mais aussi de par l'essence même du réseau, décentralisé par nature. Les informations, qui transitaient systématiquement par les Etats-Unis pour aller d'un point à l'autre de la planète, passent désormais par des nœuds situés hors du territoire américain, via des équipementiers qui ne sont pas forcément américains. Cette perte de contrôle est un réel revers pour le pays, qui entendait contrôler le trafic mondial d'Internet grâce à des accords entre la National Security Agency (NSA) et les principales compagnies de télécommunications américaines, comme le révélait le New York Times en 2005.

Un siècle et demi après les premiers essais de câblage sous-marin, cette nouvelle accélération de densification du maillage va donc profiter au désenclavement des pays émergents, à leur développement économique, mais aussi à une certaine indépendance de ces nations vis-à-vis du monopole sdu gouvernement et des "vieux garçons" américains. A moins que Google ne mette tout le monde d'accord avec ses investissements records annoncés pour le continent africain, notamment pour la mise en place d'un câble passant par l'Afrique du Sud, et par le lancement, prévu pour 2011, du SJC (South Asia Japan Cable), deuxième câble connecté à Unity reliant le Japon à l'île de Guam, à Hongkong, aux Philippines, à la Thaïlande et à Singapour.



 


Laurent Checola et Olivier Dumons

A lire

La Fracture numérique, de Gabriel Dupuy, Ellipses, 2007.
Du morse à l'Internet,
150 ans de télécommunications par câbles sous-marins, de R. Salvador, G. Fouchard, Y. Rolland et A. P. Leclerc, Ed. AAcsM, 2006.
"Les nœuds et les liens du réseau Internet : approche géographique, économique et technique", de Gilles Puel et Charlotte Ullmann, revue L'Espace géographique, Belin, 2006.

 




Lexique

CRIA Regroupant environ 25 chercheurs, le Centre de recherche sur les réseaux, l'industrie et l'aménagement est un laboratoire de recherche dépendant de l'université Paris-I-Panthéon-Sorbonne.
Fibre optique C'est un fil en silice très fin (quelques microns) pouvant conduire des ondes lumineuses et servant dans les transmissions terrestres et océaniques de données. La fibre offre un débit de transmission bien supérieur à celui des câbles coaxiaux (en cuivre), et peut ainsi supporter un réseau "large bande" par lequel peuvent transiter la télévision, le téléphone ou les données informatiques. Le cœur des grands câbles sous-marins contient jusqu'à 16 fibres.
Térabit Alors que le débit moyen d'une connexion haut débit résidentielle se compte en mégabits, les principales dorsales ont un débit qui se chiffre en térabits, soit 1 million de mégabits.
UIT L'Union internationale des télécommunications, basée à Genève, est un organisme onusien chargé de réglementer et planifier les télécommunications dans le monde.
VoIP Acronyme de "Voice over Internet protocol". C'est une technique qui permet de communiquer par la voix, via le réseau Internet.

Par Charles de La Barre - Publié dans : overreaction
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Vendredi 14 novembre 2008 5 14 /11 /Nov /2008 04:59

Otto de Habsbourg,
un siècle de mémoire vivante

Jean Sévillia
07/11/2008 | Mise à jour : 16:43 |
Commentaires 12
.
Héritier d’une des plus vieilles dynasties européennes, Otto de Habsbourg, au cours de sa vie, a lui-même changé plusieurs fois d’époque. Ici, à Rome, en 2004, lors des cérémonies de béatification de son père, Charles Ier, par Jean-Paul II. Ci-contre, avec l’empereur François-Joseph, en 1914. (Gamma)
Héritier d’une des plus vieilles dynasties européennes, Otto de Habsbourg, au cours de sa vie, a lui-même changé plusieurs fois d’époque. Ici, à Rome, en 2004, lors des cérémonies de béatification de son père, Charles Ier, par Jean-Paul II. Ci-contre, avec l’empereur François-Joseph, en 1914. (Gamma)

En 1918, la fin de la Première Guerre mondiale bouleversait la carte de l'Europe. A près de 96 ans, le fils aîné du dernier empereur d'Autriche revient sur son passé, tout en restant attentif à l'actualité.

Le petit garçon aux boucles blondes qui, juste avant la Grande Guerre, pose aux côtés de François- Joseph, c'est lui. Lui encore qui, deux ans plus tard, assiste à Budapest au couronnement de son père, le nouvel empereur d'Autriche, Charles Ier, comme roi de Hongrie, et de sa mère, l'impératrice et reine Zita. Ces scènes, Otto de Habsbourg les revoit comme si c'était hier. Le monde de sa jeunesse a été englouti, mais lui est toujours là.

Le 20 novembre prochain, il fêtera ses 96 ans. Quand il reçoit dans sa maison de Pöcking, en Bavière, acquise au temps où le territoire de l'Autriche et celui de la Hongrie lui étaient interdits, il évoque volontiers ses souvenirs. Mais ce n'est pas ce qui l'intéresse le plus. Quand je l'ai quitté, après une discussion de plusieurs heures et après que, avec son exquise courtoisie, il m'eut retenu à déjeuner, l'archiduc avait du travail : il rédigeait alors une série d'articles sur l'élection américaine. Comparer les mérites respectifs de Barack Obama et de John McCain le passionnait plus, au fond, que de refaire le film de sa vie. Il revenait d'ailleurs d'un voyage d'études en Suède, et préparait une conférence qu'il devait prononcer à Budapest...

L'Histoire a du sens pour Otto de Habsbourg, à l'évidence, mais d'autant plus qu'elle éclaire le présent. L'entendre expliquer la guerre d'Irak comme une conséquence du démantèlement de l'Empire ottoman ou exposer la stratégie de Poutine dans le Caucase comme la continuation de la politique des tsars, c'est prendre une leçon de géopolitique d'un homme dont la mémoire franchit les frontières et les siècles. Si l'intéressé attribue sa longévité à son hérédité maternelle (sa mère est morte à 97 ans), quel est le secret de sa vitalité intellectuelle ? Sans doute ce goût de servir qui lui a été inculqué dès l'enfance.

Son père, détrôné et exilé, étant mort prématurément à Madère, en 1922, l'archiduc Otto, élevé par sa mère dans l'espoir de régner un jour, devient chef de la maison de Habsbourg à sa majorité, en 1930. Quand Hitler menace l'Autriche, il engage toutes ses forces et celles de ses fidèles contre le nazisme *. En 1940, sa tête mise à prix par la Gestapo, il doit rejoindre l'Amérique. Auprès de Roosevelt - son frère Robert agissant de même, à Londres, auprès de Churchill -, il se bat pour que les Alliés, après la guerre, restaurent une Autriche indépendante. Il restera néanmoins banni de son pays, où il ne pourra revenir qu'en 1966. Pendant vingt ans, de 1979 à 1999, il siégera au Parlement de Strasbourg, y montrant une étonnante connaissance des dossiers.

Aujourd'hui, à un âge que peu atteignent, Otto de Habsbourg ne se renferme pas sur son passé : il s'efforce sans cesse de déchiffrer l'avenir. Comment s'empêcher de rêver au grand homme d'Etat qu'il aurait été ?

« Travailler pour les autres »

Le Figaro Magazine - Quels sont vos souvenirs de l'empereur François-Joseph ?

Otto de Habsbourg - Mon arrière-grand-oncle avait quelque chose de Dieu le père. Je devais avoir 2 ans quand a été prise la photo où je suis appuyé contre ses genoux. On m'avait fait venir au palais impérial, à Vienne, pour la prise de vue. A l'époque, pour éclairer, les photographes déposaient une poudre sur un plateau et y mettaient le feu avant le cliché. Je revois la scène. Je me rappelle aussi l'enterrement de l'empereur, par une froide journée de novembre 1916. Je me souviens de cette longue cérémonie sombre, de la descente dans la crypte des Capucins, au milieu des tombeaux de la famille. J'avais 4 ans, mais j'avais perçu l'émotion générale. Il faut se représenter que François-Joseph régnait depuis 1848. En Autriche-Hongrie, l'immense majorité des citoyens étaient nés sous son règne, avaient vécu sous son règne, et beaucoup étaient déjà morts sous son règne. Il était donc plus qu'une personne normale : à lui seul, il était une institution.

Votre père, petit-neveu de François-Joseph, lui a succédé sous le nom de Charles Ier en Autriche et de Charles IV en Hongrie. Les rois de Hongrie étaient couronnés. Vous vous rappelez le couronnement de votre père, à Budapest, le 30 décembre 1916...

La cérémonie m'a sans doute plus marqué que les obsèques de François-Joseph. Ce couronnement était un sacre, dans toute sa dimension religieuse. Le monarque ceignait la couronne de saint Etienne, roi de Hongrie en l'an mille, celle-là même qui, aujourd'hui, se trouve au centre du Parlement de Budapest. J'ai suivi cette cérémonie fastueuse, et je m'en souviens jusqu'aux petits détails. Les assistants portaient le costume national magyar, mais il était coloré pour les catholiques et noir pour les protestants. Après le couronnement proprement dit, dans l'église Mathias, le roi montait à cheval et s'élançait sur la couronne du sacre : un monticule dressé avec de la terre venue de toutes les régions de Hongrie. Lorsque je suis retourné pour la première fois à Budapest, il y a une vingtaine d'années, j'ai visité les lieux en compagnie d'historiens. Alors que ceux-ci me montraient l'endroit où avait été édifiée la colline du sacre en vue du couronnement de mon père, je leur ai répondu qu'ils se trompaient, en désignant un autre endroit. Quelques heures plus tard, ayant vérifié dans les archives, ils sont parvenus à la conclusion que c'est moi qui avais raison.

Qu'est-ce qui vous a marqué au cours du règne de vos parents, de 1916 à 1918 ?

Mon père était presque toujours absent, parce qu'il voyageait dans tout l'empire et se rendait très fréquemment sur le front. C'est pour cela que, dès son accession au trône, il a été si actif pour la paix : alors que les autres chefs d'Etat restaient dans leurs bureaux à donner des ordres, lui, ayant vu de près la souffrance des combattants, connaissait les horreurs de la guerre. Ma mère, l'impératrice Zita, s'occupait des hôpitaux, des blessés, des malades. Ce n'est qu'avec la chute de la monarchie que j'ai pu vivre quotidiennement avec mes parents.

Votre père est mort en exil, à Madère, en 1922...

Après sa dernière tentative de restauration en Hongrie, les Anglais l'avaient relégué sur cette île. Nous avions tout perdu. Notre consolation a été l'attitude de la population, qui a été envers nous d'une humanité admirable. De petits paysans nous apportaient de la nourriture : c'était touchant. A la fin de sa maladie, qui n'a pu être soignée parce que nous n'avions pas d'argent, mon père a voulu que j'assiste à sa mort. Ma mère a été d'un immense courage. Aujourd'hui, certains voudraient que l'on transfère à Vienne la dépouille de mon père, qui a été inhumé à Madère. Je n'y consentirai jamais car cela irait à l'encontre du vœu de la population locale, qui souhaite d'autant moins s'en séparer que Jean-Paul II, en 2004, a béatifié l'empereur Charles.

Quelles ont été les conséquences de l'effondrement de la Double Monarchie ?

Benes, le président tchèque, a dit un jour qu'il préférait voir Hitler à Vienne que les Habsbourg : on a vu le résultat. Et après le nazisme, il y a eu le communisme. L'Europe centrale a ainsi subi cinquante ans de totalitarisme.

Après la guerre, vous vous êtes engagé en faveur de la construction européenne...

Je m'occupais d'abord des questions danubiennes, dans la continuité des idées de mon père. Mais je me suis aperçu que c'était un espace insuffisant pour une politique à l'échelle du monde. L'Europe, c'est une réponse commune à l'ambition des nations du Vieux Continent.

Quels sont les plus grands hommes d'Etat que vous avez connus ?

Le général de Gaulle mérite d'être cité en premier. On a dit de lui une chose très vraie : qu'il était l'homme d'avant-hier et d'après-demain. Solidement établi sur le fond de l'Histoire, il allait néanmoins de l'avant. Konrad Adenauer, le Rhénan, était un penseur de la même veine, doté d'une vision internationale.

Même quand le rideau de fer partageait le continent, vous êtes resté en contact avec les peuples d'Europe centrale...

Alors que, au début des années 60, j'ai eu les pires ennuis pour rentrer en Autriche, un pays libre, j'ai pu revenir en Hongrie, dans les années 80, quand le système communiste régnait encore. Mais tout allait déjà dans le bon sens. Je suis resté en très bons termes avec Imre Pozsgay, qui était alors un des responsables du Parti communiste hongrois. Il a fait beaucoup pour ouvrir son pays. Au fond, il était plus hongrois que communiste.

Quel est le grand atout de l'Europe ?

Sa culture. Elle est si profondément ancrée qu'elle peut permettre des rebonds qu'on ne soupçonne pas. Un retour du religieux est aussi possible : regardez le succès du récent voyage de Benoît XVI en France. J'ai une grande confiance dans votre pays. Ma mère était une Bourbon, le français fait partie, avec l'allemand et le hongrois, de mes trois langues maternelles, j'ai vécu quelques années à Paris, et je suis membre de l'Institut : en France, je me sens un peu chez moi.

La crise financière actuelle vous inquiète- t-elle ?

Plaie d'argent n'est jamais mortelle. Les plaies politiques, si.

A près de 96 ans, vous voyagez toujours, vous êtes consulté...

Oui, surtout dans les nouveaux pays européens. Mais vous savez, c'est assez normal : ma famille est dans la politique depuis sept cents ans. En quelque sorte, j'ai cela dans les gènes.

Qu'est-ce que l'expérience vous a appris ?

Qu'on a toujours avantage à travailler pour les autres. Cela prolonge votre vie énormément, en vous donnant des buts. Moi, j'ai toujours des buts.

Par Charles de La Barre - Publié dans : overreaction
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Dimanche 9 novembre 2008 7 09 /11 /Nov /2008 00:19

Birth of an MTV Nation

Today, with more than 340 million viewers worldwide, MTV is a cultural phenomenon, a force that has changed the worlds of fashion, movies, and music itself. But in 1981, when a small band of men and women started the first 24-hour music channel, no one was interested—except the kids.

by Robert Sam Anson November 2000

The MTV Video Music Awards show at Radio City Music Hall this year was, as it is every year, music at its most outrageous. There was Britney Spears doing a bump-and-grind strip; there was Eminem singing bleep after bleep; there was Jennifer Lopez flashing skin; there were Toni Braxton, ’N Sync, Ricky Martin, Sting, Janet Jackson, Limp Bizkit, LL Cool J, Christina Aguilera, Macy Gray, Steven Tyler, and the Red Hot Chili Peppers acting the royalty that they are. There, midst the klieg lights and the stretch limos and the red carpets, was the cultural phenomenon that is MTV.

Now watched by more than 340 million viewers in 139 countries (among them, Russia, China, and Vietnam), MTV has been credited with creating icons (Michael Jackson and Madonna leading a long and glittering list), influencing fashion, spawning movies and television shows (Flashdance, Miami Vice), saving the music industry, even ending the Cold War. Not to mention, according to its critics, leading several young generations to perdition.

MTV has shaped so much for so long, it is hard to recall a time when there wasn’t a blocky, graffiti-sprayed M (the channel’s break-all-the-design-rules logo is counted one of the most instantly identifiable on the planet) peering into the living room. But there was. Eons ago, when Ronald Reagan was in the first months of his presidency and Bill Gates had yet to make his first billion and cable television was boasting an unheard-of two dozen choices, there was no such thing as a 24-hour music channel, and many thought that just fine. A handful of those who didn’t worked at an organization called Warner Amex Satellite Entertainment Company, wasec for infelicitous short. A joint venture of Steve Ross’s Warner Communications Incorporated and James Robinson III’s American Express, wasec was created in 1979 to provide programming for Warner Amex’s struggling cable systems. Its president was Jack Schneider, a crusty broadcasting legend who’d recently come to Warner following a long career as chief of the CBS Broadcast Group. Schneider’s number two, wasec executive vice president and chief operating officer, was 33-year-old John Lack, a Manhattan-born, self-identified “major rock ’n’ roller,” who’d made his bones running CBS’s all-news radio station in New York. The final member of the wasec management triumvirate was marketing and sales chief Bob McGroarty, another CBS Radio alum. Together, Schneider, Lack, and McGroarty oversaw the creation of two media entities (the Movie Channel, the first-ever 24-hour movie service, and Nickelodeon, a fledgling children’s channel), had a pair of others in development (tentatively titled the Games Channel and ShopAmerica), and were on the lookout for trailblazing, cheaply produced others. They had yet to find one when, one fine day in the summer of 1979, Jac Holzman, founder of Elektra Records, brought John Lack a clutch of videotapes.

What follows is the story of the cable television network that resulted, its building and formative early years—a time when everything was up for grabs, including MTV’s survival. It is told by the men and women who created MTV, their words edited and sequenced to clarify meaning. The titles that follow their names were those they held when the events described were taking place.

Jac Holzman, senior vice president, Warner communications: I’d been involved with music videos—“clips,” we were calling them then—a long time. When we came out with the first Doors album in 1967, we made a video of them doing “Break On Through.” Did it with our own in-house camera, and it cost maybe $1,000. We sent it around to the afternoon dance shows, and it helped get them a lot of attention. I thought, Gee, this is kind of nice: exposure through another medium. I was thinking also that we could probably get some exposure overseas, because we were having a tough time with our really basic American music in Europe, and videos were very big over there.Years pass, and I see a video called “Rio” made by Michael Nesmith, formerly of the Monkees, and it was a whole different order of magnitude from anything I’d seen. He understood that music was not just about audio, but had a visual component which would carry further the meaning of the song. At the time, people were listening to music sort of in one ear and out the other. Videos like “Rio,” I thought, would ground the experience more solidly. I brought it to the attention of Steve Ross, and Steve told me, “There’s an interesting guy over at wasec. Go over and meet him, and see what you guys can cook up.” So I walked into Lack’s office with this stuff and tales of my friend Nesmith. I said, “I think there is really something here. I think we are going to see more and more of these videos.”

Bob McGroarty: Lack called and said, “There’s a guy in my office showing me videos. You gotta see this.” So I went in and Jac showed us these videos they were using for promotional purposes in Europe. I said, “Jesus, we ought to take these and put them on the backside of Nickelodeon and test them in Columbus.” Lack said, “No, let’s start a network.”

Michael Nesmith: I was living in Carmel and making videos, mostly for Europe. If you get a song on TV stations over there, it’s almost assured to be a hit. “Rio” was the first. It wasn’t me singing in front of a camera, but a series of disparate images that proceed from the spirit of the song. I made other videos using the same techniques. Then Jac and I talked. He told me to go see John Lack at this Warner Amex joint cable venture. Jac said, “Something tells me he’ll get this.” I flew to New York and showed John my clips. He said, “God, can you imagine what this could mean? You put it on 24 hours a day and you got a cable channel. Will you go make me a bunch of these?” I said, “Sure.” I went back to Carmel and put together 10 half-hour shows and sent them off. John said, “This is not what I had in mind at all. You have to have hits on here, and you are sending things like Towers of Babylon and Debby Boone.” I said, “Do me a favor. Just test it and see what you’ve got.” He said, “O.K., I think Nickelodeon has some teenagers watching.” They put them on, and according to a woman who was at Nick at the time, Gerry Laybourne, the needle just went off the meter. She said, “This thing is a walkaway hit. Let’s do this.” I said, “No, because what you’re talking about is setting a channel full of commercials for records—and that just doesn’t light my fire.” John said, “We are going to take this and run with it. You sure you don’t want a seat on this bus?” I said, “Yeah, I’m sure. Just pay me for what I’ve done and I’ll go away.”

Now the idea of a 24-hour music channel had to be sold to higher-ups: Schneider first, then David Horowitz, a senior Warner executive overseeing the company’s music and cable interests.

John Lack: Schneider’s first question was “What makes you think they will watch a second time?” I said, “Jack, because when you listen to music, the first time is just to be introduced to the song. The second time, you get to know it. The third, fourth, fifth, and sixth time, you think, This is a great song. But it’s the 100th time you hear it that gives you all these psychological synapse poppings. Every time you hear it, something else happens. It reminds you of things. If we do our job right, and the videos are movies and little poems, it’s going to be even more attractive. You are going to say, ‘Oh, I just noticed that for the first time.’ ”

Jack Schneider: If you have a disc jockey with a microphone, a transmitter, and 40 records, you’ve got your radio station. So why don’t we put a disc jockey on TV? I knew that many Columbia artists had been making tapes of their work for some time, because in Europe all the radio networks were government-controlled, and all they played was orchestras. If you were Mick Jagger, video was how you broke something.

David Horowitz, co–chief operating officer, Warner communications: Jack said, “They’ve got this idea for a channel,” and since it was all-music, they wanted to discuss it with me. We went from there. They’d present their ideas, and I would ask questions, raise objections. And they’d come back with the answers. We refined and refined. And I got more and more excited as we did.

A crucial member of the project was Bob Pittman, a Mississippi Methodist minister’s son and radio-programming wizard, who’d started in the business as a 15-year-old disc jockey. In the decade since, Pittman, who’d originally been hired to program the Movie Channel, had established a reputation for whip-smartness, otherworldly self-assurance, and obsessive attention to consumer desires as he lifted one station after another to the top of its market.

Bob Pittman: I had some experience with music videos, through a show I did for NBC in ’78 called Album Tracks. A lot of other people had been playing around, but no one had hit on a winning formula. The concept I had was to have a clear image, to build an attitude. In other words, to build a brand, a channel that happened to use video clips as a building block, as opposed to being a delivery system for videos. The star wouldn’t be the videos, the star would be the channel.

As plans began taking shape, others came aboard, including two figures who would play increasingly key roles in the channel’s direction: Tom Freston, a rock-loving ex-adman, and John Sykes, an Epic Records promoter, who’d been working in the Midwest.

Tom Freston, director of regional marketing: When I got out of school, I took 18 months off and traveled. Worked as a bartender in the Caribbean and Colorado. Then I went to Benton & Bowles. First account was G.I. Joe. Vietnam was on, and we were trying to reposition him as an “action toy.” I kid you not. When they assigned me to a toilet-paper account, I said, “Oh, man,” and decided to go around the world. I went to meet a girl in Paris, and went on from there down through the Sahara Desert and just kept going. I ended up in Afghanistan, where I went into the clothing business. I came back to sort of change my life around, and read about this 24-hour music channel in Billboard. The idea appealed. First, I was a fan. Second, I’d spent a bunch of years doing something I really loved, and decided that whatever I did after would be something I loved. This was. I probably would have done it for a lot less money than they paid me.

John Sykes, director of promotions: In college, I thought, God, why can’t we put these bands on TV and get them out to places in America where they never tour? I M.C.’d and produced shows when bands came to campus. But I could only get them on the closed-circuit university system; the local cable company wouldn’t run it. When I got to Epic, I pitched a bunch of gray-haired old men on my idea, and they said, “Come back when you get 20 years’ experience in Hartford.” But, on my own, I started collecting music videos that were coming out of Europe and Australia. I persuaded my bosses to let me edit them into a one-hour show, so if customers walked into a store, they could see what a new artist like Cheap Trick looked like and maybe buy a record. Then I heard that Warner Amex had a lot of cash and wanted to get into this new business. I call Bob Pittman three times a week for five months, get an interview, and when we finally meet he hires me on the spot. But to work at this rock ’n’ roll channel, I have to buy a suit. The theory was: wear suits and ties because you are so young so you’ll look respectable and people will think you mean business. It was like IBM had shot off a rock ’n’ roll division.

By early December 1980 the group was ready to make its proposal to the wasec board. Ross was assumed to be a sure sell. The worry was James Robinson III, the conservative, Atlanta-bred C.E.O. of American Express.

John Lack: Schneider led off with the general overall concept. Then I got up and explained the business plan and all that crap—the vision, so to speak. Then Pittman got up and turned on the VCR to play the music, and it worked, thank God. Then McGroarty got up and told them what sales were going to be. At the end of it, Ross turned to Schneider and said, “Jack, would you put your money into this?” And Jack—who was 53 at the time and really didn’t think of this shit as his cup of tea—hesitated. I kicked him under the table so hard he almost fell over. And he said, “Yep, yep, yep.”

Bob Pittman: Jack was the expert on these people, and he was saying, “These Amex guys are going to be afraid of rock ’n’ roll music.” So the video clips I put on were Olivia Newton-John and the most plain-vanilla stuff I could find. Jim Robinson or Lou Gerstner, who was a member of the Amex board and is now the head of IBM, made a comment, “Do we have to play all that noise?” I was thinking, God, if they heard the stuff we were going to play.

James Robinson III: Steve Ross turns to me and says, “What do you think?” I said, “I’ve got one question. Where in the world do you get your raw material?” Steve said, “Oh, that’s no problem. Every time one of these rock groups creates a new album, they do a video clip and give it away as promotion.” I said, “You mean, you have no cost?” He said, “No.” I said, “Steve, you’ve got my $10 million.” We committed in the first two minutes. They had to spend the next 45 convincing their sister company why this was a good idea.

John Lack: Ross hemmed and hawed. Then he told a story about his daughter. He said, “You know, she said I ought to do it, so I’m going to do it.”

Having secured financial backing (which would total $25 million by the time of launch), the managers of the as-yet-unnamed new channel set out to enlist cable operators to carry the service, which, as an inducement, was being offered free of charge.

Andy Orgel, vice president for affiliate sales and marketing: One of our first trips was to the Greenbriar, where we’d assembled all the Warner cable-system managers. Our guys. I was armed with really hot music and a great story of how cable operators could make money by appealing to a tremendously valuable segment of the audience. “So,” I said, after I finished my pitch, “what do you think?” And there was total silence. Finally, one guy got up and said, “Now, if you sold me a channel of country music that really reflects America, I’d put that on—but I’m not going to put this on.” Right then, we knew we had our work cut out for us.

John Lack: The cable operators were pole climbers, guys who were engineers and had a big antenna on the highest hill in town, bringing in distant signals. They didn’t know original programming. ESPN was sports nobody else wanted, CNN was news radio on TV, HBO was unedited old movies. When they saw the crazy sex shit from New York and L.A. we were trying to sell, their attitude was “Who needs it? We got good little communities. We’re Baptist. We don’t need this crap coming in, corrupting our children.”

Jack Schneider: John Malone, the head of the biggest operation, TCI, was a pure thug. I went to sell him MTV, and he said, “I want a piece of it, 10 percent.” I said, “I’m not going to give you 10 percent of it.” And he said, “Then you’re not going to get into my systems.”

Mark Booth, affiliate-relations manager: The problem was that at the time there were probably, on average, 25 channels on a cable system, and the cable operator had about 50 options—of which ours was probably No. 48. They were much more comfortable with putting on another sports channel than they were rock ’n’ roll. And most of us were kids. It wasn’t as if we had any credibility.

John Shaker, new england sales manager: I was pitching one operator in Connecticut, playing him a tape on a boom box, so he could hear the stereo sound we were going to offer. I said, “What do you think?” He said, “I think nobody will ever buy it.” I asked, “Do you have any kids?” He said, “Eighteen and 23.” I said, “Would they like this channel?” He said, “They’d love it.” I said, “There’s the reason why you should put this on your cable system.” He said, “Yeah, but I’d hate it.”

The reception from the record companies—then mired in a slump—was only slightly warmer.

Stan Cornyn, executive vice president, Warner Bros. Records: Pittman showed up in my office and said, “Will you make these for us?” Meaning, would we spend our money to do their programming. Trying to be a good corporate scout, I said, “We are going to get into this”—which meant nothing, of course. We did do a little bit, but the people at MTV had a huge sales job. When it comes to interest in new technology, the record business finishes just ahead of the Amish.

Bob Summer, president, RCA Records: Lack took me to dinner at the Four Seasons and tried to explain why this was going to be so good for us. When you have a good business, and someone proposes to change your fundamental marketing tactic, you have to think more than twice. But you had the sense that these guys were definitely going to go for it. We signed on and started to produce videos in the range of $15,000 to $25,000 a pop. Everyone played a little at first. But no one really dove in.

John Lack: I went out to the first Billboard video-music convention, and was on a panel with Michael Nesmith, Sid Sheinberg, the president of MCA-Universal, and the head of Arbitron, one of those research companies. The guy from Arbitron gets up and says, “There is definitely a market for video music.” Nesmith gets up and says, “This is going to be the creative stuff for the next generation.” I get up and go, “Warner is putting in $25 million, and we have to get your clips.” Then Sheinberg gets up. He says, “This guy Lack is out of his fucking mind, ’cause we ain’t giving him our music.”

Jack Schneider: The record companies hated it. They said, “We made this mistake in radio—you ain’t gonna catch us making it again. You are going to have to pay for the rights to this video.” Walter Yetnikoff, the head of CBS Records, was adamant: We weren’t getting anything.

Bob Pittman: John Sykes and I used to schlepp around with a bunch of poster boards under our arms and lay out this whole presentation. We said, “We’re even going to put the name of your company on the video clip at the beginning and at the end, so if the record store doesn’t have it in stock, the viewer can say where to order it.” We didn’t wind up with enough videos, and most were Andrew Gold and even worse. But we said, “You know, if we are successful, they’ll make more videos, and if we aren’t, who the hell cares? We’ll be out of business anyway.”

The last hurdle was the advertising community, which the business plan had slated to be the new channel’s sole source of revenue. The first big pitch was to be made at a convention at the Hilton Hotel in New York, where new cable channels would be shown to major agencies. Pittman commissioned a video to give the presentation some flash, assigning the job to Fred Seibert, a Columbia-educated Grammy-nominated jazz-record producer, who had come to the Movie Channel after a stint at WHN Radio, and who would be pivotal in giving MTV its hip, anti-TV look. Working with Seibert was his Columbia classmate Alan Goodman, a brand-new Movie Channel hire, who’d been an ad copywriter at CBS Records.

Alan Goodman: The first week I was at work, Pittman walked into the little office I was sharing with Fred and said, “O.K., next week we’re announcing the music channel we’ve been planning, so why don’t you two guys make some sort of three-minute thing.” I didn’t have a clue how you make a three-minute tape. I only knew that Pittman said we had to have it in a week. So we go into the studio with a bunch of slides and four promo clips we’d gotten from Warner Records. We also had an announcer’s track that we had cleverly thought to record in stereo, because MTV was going to be the first stereo television channel. I’d come up with this idea to switch from the left channel to the right channel on each alternating line—which seemed outrageously devilish. I sat there with all this stuff, and I thought, What does my friend who produces commercials do? That’s how we got started. And after a few days, we emerged from the studio with this tape.

Fred Seibert: It was one of those dull convention days. Ten people were onstage saying they were launching cable channels, the Nostalgia Channel, this and that, even a channel specifically targeted for “old people.”

Andy Setos, senior vice president, engineering and operations: Everyone was bored to tears. All day long people had been talking about numbers that didn’t exist and screening tapes on a crappy little projection system. People were half asleep, or walking out in the halls. Well, we’d brought a little surprise: our own videotape machine, a very large screen, and state-of-the-art speakers.

Bob McGroarty: I stood at the podium and said, “On August 1, Warner Amex Satellite Entertainment Company introduces music television.” With that, Setos hits a button, and Rod Stewart is in everyone’s face. There were people, honest to God, dancing. I thought, Holy Christ! This is bigger than I ever imagined.

Fred Seibert: You would have thought we’d dropped the Beatles in the middle of the thing. The room was on its feet clapping and cheering. I’m like, Oh, my God, I’m in a rock band again.

The new channel’s rock bands would be presented by “V.J.’s.” To find them, Robert Morton, later to become David Letterman’s executive producer, and Sue Steinberg mounted a bi-coastal search.

Sue Steinberg, executive producer: We wanted V.J.’s who would be part of our audience, who wouldn’t say, “I’m the host of your show today,” but “I’m so-and-so and I will be with you for the next couple hours.” The important words were “with you.” We wanted you to come on this ride with us.

Alan Hunter, V.J.: I was an actor and had been in New York for about a year, and bumped into Pittman and Sykes in Central Park at the “Way Up North in Mississippi Picnic,” an annual event for people born, bred, or, like I was, educated in Mississippi. There was a lot of watermelon eating and “Dixie” singing, but Pittman and Sykes were dressed up like they were loaded for business bear. Bob said he was working on some venture for Warner Amex, I said I was a bartender, and that was about it. Three weeks later I get a call from Sue Steinberg, who says, “Bob thinks you should come and audition.” I got hired three weeks before we went on the air. At that point, they must have been sweating bullets.

Nina Blackwood, V.J.: I was in L.A. working on video projects as a host. I was always reading Billboard, and I saw this ad saying, “24-hour music channel looking for on-air hosts. Must be knowledgeable and love music.” I sent off my résumé and my 8-by-10s in a picture book I drew with crayons, because I wanted to make it look punkish. I was dressed head to foot in black the day I did the audition. I was dying because I was so warm—but I had to look cool. Couple of months went by and I didn’t hear anything. I called up the number they’d given me, and they said, “Oh, yeah, we want you to fly to New York.” I went, and Sue and Robert say, “We want to hire you, but you have to move to New York.” Knowing I’m not totally knocked out about that, they take me to lunch at Tavern on the Green, where something gets stuck in my throat. Morton jumps up and gives me the Heimlich maneuver. “Now you have to take this job,” he says. “I saved your life.”

J. J. Jackson, V.J.: I was on an L.A. radio station called K-West. They changed formats, and I was gone in a day. So I got an audition, where I was supposed to interview one of the producers, pretending that he was Billy Joel—which made it kind of difficult for me, because I didn’t particularly care for Billy Joel. But I knew my shit rock-’n’-roll-wise, and they were very impressed. They said, “You know, of course, that you will have to move to New York.” I said, “You see that beautiful black Jensen Interceptor sitting out there? You see those mountains, that blue sky, those big, puffy clouds? All that goes away if I go to Manhattan. But I’ll go, ’cause I need the gig.”

Martha Quinn, V.J.: I was a senior at N.Y.U., just doing my thing, which included doing some television commercials to put myself through college, and being an intern at WNBC Radio, where Bob Pittman had been the program director. I was at the station one afternoon when a guy in the office said, “You should be a V.J.” I said, “What’s a V.J.?” And he said, “It’s just like being on the radio, but it’s on television.” To which I replied, “What do you do during the records?” He said, “It’s videos, fool.” I couldn’t imagine what he was talking about. But he called Pittman, who said I should come right away. It’s 5:30, my hair is stringy, I’m wearing a glitter iron-on T-shirt with country music is in my blood written on it, I’ve got no makeup on, and I’m wearing tennis shorts, but I go. Two days later, there’s a message on my answering machine from Sue, saying, “We’ve got good news for you.”

Mark Goodman, V.J.: I was working at WPLJ in New York and getting sick of talking to Hair Bands who thought that because they were wealthy they had something to say. I heard about MTV, got an audition, was freaked and nervous, but got hired. In Sue’s casting vision, I was the hunk, Nina was the vamp, Martha was the cute girl next door, Alan was the jock, J.J. was the cool black guy. I never felt like a hunk, but I thanked her for placing me in the role.

With the August 1, 1981, launch date fast approaching, the staff scrambled to attend to a thousand details, starting with coming up with a channel name.

Steve Casey, director of music programming: Bob wanted to call it “TV1,” but it turned out the damned Italians had it. Lack talked about “the Music Channel,” but that didn’t work, either: the initials would be the same as the Movie Channel. We were under pressure to do something, so we were writing out different possibilities. Finally, I came up with “MTV.” I didn’t like the way it sounded so much as the way it looked. It really seemed cool. No one said “Great,” but no one had a better idea, and that ended the meeting.

Sue Steinberg: Saturday Night Live had a set that was sort of a netherworld. That’s what I wanted—the viewer to use their imagination to figure out where they were. The look we gave it was somewhere between a SoHo loft—those were really cool spaces in New York; you envied the people who lived there—and a rec room, like the ones where I’d grown up in Pennsylvania. It was a space where you could do whatever you wanted, space where you knew your parents wouldn’t go.

Fred Seibert: We were sitting around talking about what we wanted to claim at the top of every hour, and I said, “Seems to me that the thing we are most conceited about is that we actually think that we are changing the world. Well, at least the world of television.” That got us talking about the most famous things that have ever happened on television. Someone says the Kennedy assassination, but we know we can’t use that. Finally, I said, “The moonwalk. I was in Sofia, Bulgaria, when it happened, and saw the streets clear out because everyone was going to a television set to watch. So let’s use the moonwalk and the flag.” And Marcy Brafman, who was running the promotion department, says, “Cool—space is very rock ’n’ roll.”

Tom Freston: We knew we needed a real signature piece that would look different from everything else on TV. We also knew that we had no money. So we went to nasa and got the man-on-the-moon footage, which is public domain. We put our logo on the flag and some music under it. We thought that was sort of a rock ’n’ roll attitude: “Let’s take man’s greatest moment technologically, and rip it off.”

Fred Seibert: We were going to include Neil Armstrong doing his “One small step,” but the lawyers said, “You can’t. Neil Armstrong owns his name and likeness.” I’m 28 or 29 and rolling my eyes at these stupid lawyers. “It’s all done,” I say. “We’ve got to use it. It will be terrible without it.” The lawyer says, “Sorry.” So I said, “Call Neil Armstrong.” They do, and Armstrong says, “Are you crazy?” We got to put in something, and Marcy comes up with “Beep … beep … beep,” ’cause nothing else will fill the space. We ran that “Beep … beep … beep” 17,000 times a year.

Patti Rogoff, Manhattan Design: Fred Seibert came to see us one day to talk about this dream of a 24-hour cable TV station. At the time, cable was nothing, but rock ’n’ roll was something, so we all got very excited and started scribbling away. I wasn’t a design partner; I did the billing and wrote the contracts. But I scribbled, too, on this little piece of tissue that got all crumpled up and put at the bottom of the envelope when we sent over all the ideas. Fred had said he wanted something comparable to the CBS eye. Something strong and unforgettable that said music and said television. Now, rock ’n’ roll was not my thing then. I’m a Detroit girl; jazz and Motown were my thing. But you could not get away from rock in that office, which was one 10-by-10 room in the back of a Tai Chi school on top of Bigelow’s Pharmacy on Sixth Avenue. They played rock all day long. If things got tense, they’d crank up the music, which made me even crazier. So, even though I didn’t love it, rock ’n’ roll was this big, blocky, heavy thing hitting me in the head all of the time. I’m sketching, and I’m vaguely remembering walking down 10th Street in the Village and passing the playground of an elementary school, and looking at a brick wall that the kids had painted with graffiti. And it all came into my mind: a graffiti “TV”—which was the constantly changing television-image thing—on top of a big, three-dimensional M—the force rock was having in my life.

Tom Freston: We took the logo over to Ogilvy & Mather, the big-time, Establishment ad agency we were using at the time, and the guy there was appalled. He said, “I’ve been in this business for 20 years, and you kids don’t know anything. The first rule is that you never change anything. You need to have a static image. It needs to be consistent.” We said, “Our consistency will be our inconsistency. We’ll turn it inside out.” And he said, “It looks like you are running a fucking cinder-block company here.” When we left, he called Schneider to squeal on us: “These guys are about to take this biz down the tubes. They have the ugliest fucking logo behind the stupidest idea you have ever seen.” But Jack, who was about as far removed from popular culture as anyone you could find, trusted our instincts. He let it slide.

Steve Casey: We had about 120 videos total, so I couldn’t afford to be real choosy. If you could get through an entire video, and there were no glitches, it was “O.K., we’ll play that.” One of the videos we were able to get our hands on was “Video Killed the Radio Star,” by the Buggles, an English group. It was anything but a hit. You might think that the best way to start a channel would be with a No. 1 song. But I’m kind of a twisted guy, and as soon as I saw it, I knew we had to start with this thing.

The evening of August 1, MTV’s staff boarded buses for a trip across the George Washington Bridge to the basement of a sports bar in Fort Lee, New Jersey, the closest place to Manhattan with a signal.

John Lack: I’d gone into the studio earlier that day to record an opening. It was “Ladies and gentlemen, rock ’n’ roll.” Then the spaceship went up, and then the first song: “Video Killed the Radio Star.” It was like a baby was born.

Sue Binford, public-relations manager: We all had our new MTV black satin jackets with the logo on the back. People were crammed into this very small room, and there were screens scattered around. Everyone felt it had been a long spring and summer, and nobody had slept getting this thing launched, so we were ready to party, no matter what. Then, at a minute past midnight, it was “Five … four … three … two … one … ,” and we all kind of crossed our fingers and hoped for the best.

Bob Pittman: I spent the entire evening on a pay phone talking to Andy Setos, trying to figure out what was going on and straighten it out. All the V.J. segments were out of sequence. They would say, “That was,” and it wasn’t, and “Coming up is,” and it wasn’t coming up. The polarization on the wires was also switched, so if you were listening in stereo, it was fine, but if you were in mono, it was canceling the sound out. There were all sorts of things happening. I was in sheer panic.

Andy Setos: At 12:15, Pittman calls the control room and in his best southern drawl says, “Andy, the clips aren’t playing in the right order.” We were all bedraggled, hadn’t had any sleep for days. The building where we were working wasn’t even finished. We were using Port-O-Sans, and the air-conditioning was coming in through these big tubes. I said, “Bob, are they playing?” It was bad, and who knows who was even watching. But all the equipment functioned, and, damn it, we were on the air.

Tom Freston: There had been so much focus, so much work, on what that first hour would be like. And I thought, How foolish. Because ain’t nobody saw the first hour, really. And then we had a constant stream of 24-hour days after that to fill up. Because, unless we went out of business, we would never go off the air.

The press was largely critical of MTV’s debut, and with the channel not airing in the biggest media markets, advertisers, cable operators, and record companies yawned. Desperate for positive feedback, Pittman dispatched Freston and Sykes to four midsize cities with cable systems carrying MTV. The orders were to find upbeat stories—and not to come back until they did. Their first stop was Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Tom Freston: John had worn an MTV button on his suit, and when we went into the hotel, it was “Oh, man, MTV! Can I have that?” The bellhop would want it, the waitress would want it. It was the hottest thing in town. I called the people back in New York and said, “You will not believe it—this thing is working!”

John Sykes: We finally hit pay dirt when we went into a record store and asked if there was any reaction to the songs we were playing that weren’t being played on the local radio stations. The manager said, “Yeah, we sold a box of Buggles albums.” We were like, “Yes!” Within two weeks, we had trade ads in Billboard, with quotes from all the store managers in Tulsa, claiming that MTV was having this profound impact on record sales.

Back at MTV, the most pressing problem was finding more—and better—videos.

John Lack: The music in the beginning wasn’t that good. It was mediocre bands playing, or stupid poetry, or psychedelic bullshit.

Alan Hunter: There just wasn’t a whole lot of catalogue. I came to work one day and said to the producer, “I have seen these REO Speedwagon videos so many fucking times, I have flat run out of things to say.” It was my shortest shift ever.

Sue Binford: Pat Benatar’s video played so often, every time it came on, the whole room would break into the chorus: “You better run, you better hide … ” We could all sing it in our sleep. When we had a new video on, everyone would just stop. We’d be so excited seeing something different on the screen.

Gale Sparrow, talent coordinator: Rod Stewart had eight videos, and we played one or two of them every hour on the hour. Thank God he had decent videos and his songs were good. We could have destroyed his career.

Gradually, the record companies began to unbend, partly because of the impact MTV was starting to have on sales, partly because their artists left them no choice.

Bob McGroarty: We’d been asking the record companies to produce videos with no guarantee of success, so we’d been left with groups like Adam Ant that no one else had. But, all of a sudden, people were coming into record stores and saying, “I want Adam Ant’s new album.”

Stan Cornyn: It was reported back to us that records were selling in certain cities without radio airplay. We asked “Why?” and it turned out that there were music videos playing on MTV. An act like Devo is dancing around in their funny masks and stuff like that—and they take off in a market where nothing else is happening. You got to be an idiot not to say, “Something is happening here, let’s pay attention to this.”

Gale Sparrow: We weren’t in New York or L.A., but when artists were on the road, they’d be in their hotel rooms watching us, and they’d call back to their record companies and say, “Why aren’t my videos on this channel?” It got to the point where artists were saying that if they didn’t send these videos to be played on MTV, they would leave the record company. As soon as the artists started insisting, that changed it: we began getting videos.

Lenny Waronker, president, Warner Bros. Records: The pressure from artists and managers was awful. Everybody wanted to do a video. You had to get on. The kids would hang around late at night to watch.

Billy Idol, musician: Radio guys would take one look at my picture with the spiky hair and say, “Punk-rocker. Not playing him.” Then MTV airs my videos, and kids start calling up radio stations saying, “I want to hear Billy Idol!” It really broke the thing wide open. We’d never touched the charts, and the next minute we had a Top 10 album. It was amazing. Nobody’d ever noticed me before. Now I’m walking down the street, and people are yelling “Billy!”

Brian Setzer, musician, the Stray Cats: We put out “Stray Cat Strut,” radio didn’t play it and it flopped. We put it out again, but with a video. Our girlfriends were in it, because we didn’t want friggin’ fashion models—we wanted cool people: rockabilly chicks. MTV played the hell out of it and it clicked. We were playing Tulsa, place called Old Lady of Brady, and cowboys with skinny ties and stuff were coming to see us, guys with black leather jackets and big pompadours and motorcycle boots. It brought us to the masses, MTV.

As more videos came in, so did new hires, including a self-described “nice, straightforward, middle-class girl” who’d be pivotal in MTV’s later years.

Judy McGrath, copywriter: I was at Mademoiselle and Glamour, writing stuff like “Models’ Party Tips,” when I got a call from a friend who knew I loved music. “They are starting this thing called MTV, and their promotion department is looking for a writer,” she said. “You should meet them.” I go over, and the first thing the person who is interviewing me says is “Who is your favorite band?” I tell him. He goes, “You’re wrong,” and proceeds to spend the next hour trashing my choice. Then he says, “You really want to work here? Gee, you’re hired.” I went into the creative group, where they made the TV equivalent of liner notes. It was filled with all these crazy creative types who probably couldn’t find gainful employment anywhere else. The kind of people you know you are going to want to hang out with.

There was a chance for everyone to hang out that December 31, when MTV staged its first New Year’s Eve Rock ’n’ Roll Ball.

Judy McGrath: We decided we can’t do Dick Clark’s New Year’s Rockin’ Eve one more time. There’s got to be another choice. We had it in the ballroom of this bad hotel on 44th Street. Sykes was at the door, and John Belushi was in the stairwell, and Bow Wow Wow was onstage. It was the first time I ever saw a mix of Saturday Night Live people, music people, movie people, downtown art people, even a few celebs, all finding a common place to hang out.

Brian Diamond, production assistant: I saw John Belushi leaning on a support beam and taking a drink. And then he just slid down in slow motion and fell into a pile on the floor. This was three months before he died.

Fred Seibert: We’ve only been on the air since August, so I got the bright idea, Why not invite everyone? All the Warner Amex employees, all the cable operators. Paper the house. It’s New York, it’s New Year’s Eve. They’re going to come from Wisconsin? I show up, and it’s raining and snowing and 30 degrees, and there are people in tuxedos lined all the way around the block into Times Square. Vice presidents of Warner Amex I can’t let in, because the fire marshal is going, “One more person comes in and the thing gets shut down.”

Andy Setos: That was the craziest New Year’s Eve of my life. People were trying to get into this thing, saying, “I am the sister of the guy that shines the shoes of the agent of the band that is up there right now.”

Sue Binford: People were standing there under umbrellas—dressed-up-for-a-New-Year’s-Eve-party-type people who looked like they could be advertisers. I thought, My God, this is a hot ticket, and now they may never give us the time of day again. So we had an army going up and down the line trying to identify anyone who could keep us afloat, bringing them food and drink. It became a block party outside.

More fun was to come, courtesy of the new vice president for programming, Les Garland, a much-traveled, southern-Missouri-born radio jock who addressed one and all as “bud.”

Marcy Brafman, director of on-air promotions: The weekly music meetings were every Tuesday in Les’s office. All the department heads would come, and they’d be such fun. They’d put on the new videos, and Les would crank up these huge speakers, and we’d all get to talk about why we thought something should come in, and whether it should be in heavy rotation, which was three or four times a day, or light rotation, which was once or twice a day, or “lunar rotation,” which was, like, once a month. It was exciting, because the music was very exciting then, and it hadn’t been for a real long time.

Andy Setos: Les had theater speakers in his office five feet tall and two feet wide. And he would play them so loud we would get tenants in the building two stories up complaining. I’d say, “Les, you are not going to be able to hear anything anymore after a while.” He’d go, “Yeah, but it’s cool while it’s happening!”

Rick Krim, business manager: I was living outside Philly, working for Price Waterhouse as a first-year accountant, about as far removed from the music business as you could be. One weekend I went to the wedding of my friend from my hometown and bumped into a girl from home, Joan Myers. She tells me she is the assistant to the head of programming at MTV, Les Garland. I said, “Wow! How can I work there?” She says, “Well, it just so happens that my boss, who is not so financially oriented, is looking for someone to, like, run the company’s money.” I go for an interview. Les says, “Myers says you’re cool. When can you start, bud?” That was it. I was 22.

Ronald E. “Buzz” Brindle, director of music programming: I was in a closed-door meeting in Les’s office with Sykes and a couple of other guys, and it happened to be Les’s birthday. There’s a knock, and Les’s secretary ushers in an attractive young woman in a business outfit, who’s carrying a boom box and what appears to be some presentation papers. She starts talking about some product she’s trying to sell. Les is listening and checking her out. Then she starts playing this cassette of bump-and-grind music, and begins stripping. Next thing you know this rather buxom young woman is prancing around Les’s office in her panties. Les’s immediate response is to get up and pull his pants down. Meanwhile, we’re still trying to conduct the meeting. I’m sitting there trying to make a point, while she is bouncing her breasts on top of my bald pate. I thought, This is the perfect Les Garland meeting.

Things were bopping all over MTV, day and night.

John Lack: You put out a product like Clorox, it doesn’t change much in 25 years. You do MTV every day, you better be good and smart and hot and quick—because this generation is changing every 10 minutes. A lot of friends of mine left because they couldn’t keep up. But if you were good, it was the best life you could have, because it was rock ’n’ roll, it was drugs, it was alcohol, it was good-looking women, it was everything that kids love.

Brian Diamond: We were having a big staff meeting, after we’d been on the air about a month, and John Lack walks in. He’s wearing a three-piece suit and smoking a big cigar and all these words start coming out of his mouth. “Things look good, but they have to look great. We have to be different. This can’t look like any television anybody has ever seen. If J.J. is in a lousy mood, let him be in a lousy mood. We want to see that. If he wants to pick up a chair and throw it through a window, let him do it.” Our jaws were on the ground. We’d never heard anybody talk about television like this before.

Les Garland: We had people that slept under their desks. Maybe they passed out. Because we rocked a little bit, too.

Tom Freston: You’d be out five or six nights of the week easily. A lot of relationships got burnt, a lot of people got burnt. I lost a marriage, and a lot of other people had drug or drinking issues, or just couldn’t take it. It was survival of the fittest.

Gale Sparrow: After work, we’d all go over to the restaurant across the street, where everybody from the owner to the dishwasher were wearing MTV T-shirts and buttons. We’d write our ideas on tablecloths until two in the morning, then go out to a club to see a band. Show would be over at three, and we’re back at work at nine, Garland greeting us with Tom Jones singing “It’s Not Unusual” at top volume. “O.K., buds,” Garland says. “We know we’re tired, but we’re going to make it through another day.”

Joe Davola, associate producer: Sue Steinberg came in with these stringer reports we were getting across the country. “We need you to edit this thing,” she said. “Yeah,” I say, like I know what I’m doing. I didn’t know anything. I just got a stopwatch, went into an editing room, and figured it out. That’s how it was all the time at MTV. Just: “Here, go off and do it.” We had huge testicles. There was no fear. It was us against the world.

Bob Pittman: We were a bunch of kids, and when you are a kid, you are just completely sure that you are right. You are maniacal. All of our social life was hanging out with each other. We had some of our best ideas over dinner, drinking and talking and laughing. Someone would say, “Let’s buy a house and give it away in a contest.” And it would be “Hey, why not?”

Mark Pellington, production assistant, promotion department: We’d wear bathing suits and flip-flops and blast music, like kids in a playground. “What if I just throw this shit under the color camera and we turn it negative?” we’d say. “Oh, that looks cool.” And you would see it on the air. Nobody would be telling you what you were doing was wrong. Nobody was saying, “This isn’t linear, this isn’t the right way to do graphics.” They’d just say, “This is our spirit, great.”

Bob Friedman, director of marketing: We didn’t have purple hair in my department, and a couple of us had been to business school, but no one was letting on that they had. MTV was the one place where you’d never admit you’d gone to business school. It was like a collective. We were kids, though, and one day, a very important client was coming, and we were wondering what we could do to seem more mature and grown-up. Someone said, “Let’s buy some of those pictures of fake families and leave them on our desks.” That’s what we did: put pictures of fake families on our desks.

Judy McGrath: I had a friend who went to the Wharton business school who came over sometimes. He’d shake his head and say, “This cannot be a business. This cannot be working. I mean, look at these people! It’s just wrong.”

Par Charles de La Barre - Publié dans : overreaction
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Dimanche 9 novembre 2008 7 09 /11 /Nov /2008 00:17

The contests and promotions MTV used to build viewership projected the lunatic spirit.

John Sykes: I’d sit back and say, “All right, what wild, insane, off-the-wall dream can I come up with, put it on TV, have someone actually win it? How about a lost weekend with Van Halen? If you win, we’ll pick you and your buddy up in a Learjet and fly you off for 48 hours of pure decadence with the greatest rock ’n’ roll band in the world.” If you are 18 years old, that’s a great fantasy.

Richard Schenkman, production assistant: Kid from Pennsylvania wins, and we fly him to Detroit, where Van Halen is performing. The first night, he goes to the show. The band has a big sheet cake onstage, David Lee Roth brings him out, and, as the crowd go apeshit, they dump the cake on him and spray him down completely with bottles of champagne. Show’s over, they go backstage. Van Halen is drinking Jack Daniel’s and the kid is drinking Jack Daniel’s and everyone is getting drunker and drunker. Finally, they throw the kid into the shower to wash him off. A few minutes later, I hear “AAAAAAhhhhhhh … ” coming from the shower. Turns out, they threw one of their groupies into the shower, too.

The music, the mayhem, and the message were beginning to have an effect.

Mark Goodman:I was making a record-store appearance in Wyoming. I thought it would be like Spinal Tap and that there’d be four people there. Well, we round this bend and there are, like, 1,500 people. I thought, My God, who’s here? Then I realized: I’m here!

Marcy Brafman: I knew we were doing something right when I gave my dad an MTV T-shirt. He’d wear it, and the kids would want to mow his lawn for free.

Dom Fioravanti, general manager: I was living in suburban New Jersey and really getting it from the coaches of the local Pop Warner football team. They were accusing me of wrecking their program, because little boys were coming home from school and watching MTV all afternoon, instead of going out for football. But with my kids and all the kids in the neighborhood, I was something sort of special.

Judy McGrath: Tom Freston was in a barbershop one day, and everyone was asking for Rod Stewart haircuts, saying, “I saw it on MTV.” When it begins creeping into that part of the culture, you realized this was not just a couple of unemployed rock fans hanging around watching TV all day. Other people were starting to notice.

Alan Hunter: I kept my bartending job for a month, because I didn’t really know how MTV was going to do. Actor’s mentality. One night, I’m making a daiquiri for a guy, and he’s cocking his head, staring at me the longest time. Finally, he says, “Man, you look so damn familiar.” Then he snapped his fingers. “Man, your voice is familiar, too.” I said, “Where are you from?” He says, “Jersey.” I say, “You ever watch that MTV show?” He says, “Yes.” That’s when I began to realize that maybe MTV is going to be a job I can keep.

For all the buzz, MTV was hemorrhaging cash, as advertisers—the sole source of revenue—hung back, spooked by the continued refusal of most cable operators to carry the channel. Numbers told the story. At launch, MTV publicly claimed 2.5 million cable customers. In fact, MTV executives admit, the total was well below a million.

Beverly Weinstein, ad sales: The first year, we were lucky if we made $1 million in sales. There was no interest, no ratings, no nothing. The ad biz is very risk-averse, and this was something that was brand-new. People just weren’t standing in line to buy it.

Jordan Rost, vice president, research: The people we needed to sell were not in the demographics, didn’t have passion about music, didn’t care what was happening in Council Bluffs. Until they saw their own kids going wild, they weren’t going to buy.

Fred Seibert: I went to a cable convention after we launched, and the talk on the floor was the Weather Channel, not MTV. Because that’s how old the operators were. They didn’t spend their weekends thinking, Who’s on Top of the Pops? They spent their weekends going, “Thank God it’s nice out.”

George Lois, ad-agency executive: Everyone considered MTV the stupidest idea in the history of communications. Rock ’n’ roll 24 hours a day? Talking to 16-year-old idiots? Sex, drugs, blah, blah, blah? It was a joke.

In early 1982, Pittman instructed Lois’s partner Dale Pon to devise an ad campaign that would break the logjam.

Dale Pon: They were scared. Everybody I ran into told me: “This has got to work. We’re counting on you, Dale. Don’t fuck up. In 45 days, new stuff has got to go on the air.” So I’m thinking about rock ’n’ roll and everything that is related to rock ’n’ roll. And the question I put to myself was “What’s your favorite rock ’n’ roll song of all time?” For me, it was the Rolling Stones’ “Satisfaction.” That helped me understand the true nature of rock ’n’ roll: insatiable desire. We’d done an earlier trade ad campaign called “Cable brats”—“Rock and roll wasn’t enough for them. Now they want their MTV.” We just shortened it to “I want my MTV,” an homage to a famous cereal campaign George did in the 60s. Then a partner of mine, Dick Gershon, had a brilliant idea: “Let’s advertise where there is no distribution, where the cable operator has said no. We say, ‘Call your cable operator, America! Demand your MTV! Here’s the phone number. Make them fucking sorry they said no.’ ”

Lois presented the pitch to MTV’s senior staff.

Les Garland: George comes rolling in with his easel and says, “Garland, who does MTV belong to?” Warner Amex. Wrong. “Pittman, who does MTV belong to?” He’s got this trick-question thing going with everyone in the room. Finally he says, “MTV is the color-TV phenomenon, you guys. If you are the kid on the block with the first color TV, all the other kids come to your house to watch it. Same with MTV. It’s that cool. It’s theirs, the kids’, it belongs to them. I came up with a campaign for a breakfast cereal called Maypo. We had sports stars like Mickey Mantle and Wilt Chamberlain saying, ‘I want my Maypo!’ This campaign is going to be a bunch of rock stars saying, ‘I want my MTV!’ Garland,” he goes, “can you get Mick Jagger to say that?” I go, “I think so.” He goes, “That’s who we got to get first. Mick Jagger is the most important rock star in the world. If we can get him to do it, the rest of them will be easy.” And I go, “I fucking love it.”

The others present were more cautious, but came around.

David Horowitz: The cable operators were so strong, you were warned not to go behind them to the public. That was a real no-no. They would break you if you did that. But it came to the point where we didn’t have a choice.

John Lack: We have this big powwow, and the question is “Do we go around the gatekeeper and go right to the customer?” ’Cause we knew this product was going to be hot with young people—we just had to get to them. But we couldn’t get to them without distribution, and, of course, these cable operators held the keys. After much agony, long hours of fighting, we decided to go for it.

Bob Pittman: This was a Hail Mary. ’Cause if it didn’t work, we were never going to make it.

The trick now was getting Jagger to agree.

Les Garland: We find out that Mick is touring in Paris and will see us. So we jump on a plane. It’s a gamble: we don’t know whether we are going to get Mick to do it or not. But we are in the hotel, ready to meet. Truth be told, I disappeared for a day and a half, and found a couple of women that were just so much fun. If I have the time, I will rock. Anyway, the phone call comes. I go to Mick’s room, and went into the rap: We were about to embark upon this campaign, and he being who he is, it was vitally important that he say yes to my request. Which is that he agrees to us shooting him the next day saying, “I want my MTV!” He says, “I don’t do commercials.” I say, “I prefer to look at it as more of an endorsement for a new phenomenon called music video. We just happen to be the only venue that plays them.” He goes, “It’s still a commercial.” I go, “If you were paid, does that change it?” And he goes, “Well …” So I say, “All right, Mick,” and I reach into my pocket, pull out a dollar bill, and lay it on the table. And I say, “Will you take it?” He starts laughing and says, “Garland, I’ll do it.” The next day, we do the shoot and then hightail it back to New York, where Sykes is, dialing in rock stars left and right. Pete Townshend and David Bowie and Pat Benatar and John Cougar—we have a bunch of them in the can. We had the campaign on TV within 14 days.

The impact of the $2 million ad blitz in March 1982 was instant and overwhelming.

Bob McGroarty: I got calls from cable operators saying, “Take those spots off the air! We are getting flooded with phone calls and it’s screwing up our business!” I said, “Oh, really?” and called Dale Pon and said, “Put more spots on.”

John Lack: We bought $300,000 worth of airtime in Denver, where TCI is, and we blew Denver away: “I want my MTV! I want my MTV!” The phones rang like it was an avalanche. After two weeks, Malone calls and says, “I give.”

Tom Freston: We’d go in and attack a town and we’d run like three or four weeks of this advertising and the phones would ring off the hook and every cable operator in the market would add the service. And we’d be off to another city. We were rolling across the country and adding a million subs a month. It was fantastic.

Les Garland: Before the campaign, we did a study of the target audience and found that the awareness factor—people who had seen MTV or heard of it—was just under 20 percent. Four weeks later, we do the same study. The recognition factor now is 89 percent.

The last bastion to fall was Time Inc.–owned Manhattan Cable.

Dale Pon: New York was hard. The “I Want My MTV” campaign would run periodically, but the guy who ran the system said, “The phone can ring all it wants. I don’t care. The other cable operators are just weak. I’m not going to be bullied or blackmailed. Don’t fuck with me. I’m not doing it.”

Jack Gault, president, Manhattan Cable: My 13-year-old son wanted his MTV. What teenage kid didn’t? But we clearly were the most important cable TV system in the country. I thought they should pay. They thought that was heresy. So the negotiation was protracted. Finally we got creative and came up with a deal where they would buy some of my unsold ad inventory.

To celebrate the deal, MTV executives hosted a party for cable operators at a tony Manhattan nightspot. To buck up the staff, which had been excluded, Garland came up with a counter.

Les Garland: I went to Pittman and said, “I want to do something really cool for the staff. Have a first-birthday party. Not real big.” He said, “Gar-man, neat idea, but we just can’t do it. Money is too tight. It wouldn’t look good corporately.” I’m pissed, so I get my department heads and said, “Guys, put together a party and don’t tell me anything.” One of them says, “Gar-man, where are we going to get the money?” I’m like, “Please, give me a break. Surely each of you can find a few thousand dollars in your budget and make it look like something else. I mean, we aren’t beginners here.” I start hearing rumblings in the hallways: This thing is going to be a blowout. I’m still playing dumb, but at some point they come to me and say, “Garland, we are really struggling for a theme.” I said, “What’s more fun than gambling?” They find some unbelievable location, and the night of the party I show up at 10:30, and the kids are having a ball. Everyone’s got a wad of fake money—my face is on it, it’s Garland money—and there are prizes—TVs and stereo systems and motorcycles and all kinds of shit—and everybody is getting hammered. “Speech, speech,” they are saying. I get up on the stage half snockered and go into my best Bob Pittman imitation. And who do I see in the audience? Bob Pittman. He says to me, “We’ll deal with this Monday.” All weekend I’m going, I’m outta here. Monday morning, I’m sitting in my office, and Dwight Tierney, who’s in charge of human relations, calls. I think, Oh, shit, here we go, they’re blowing me out. I say, “You want me to bring my lawyer?” He says, “What are you talking about? All we need to know is where you got the prizes. Other than that, no problem.” That’s why I love Pittman.

With MTV airing in New York and Los Angeles by the turn of the year, everyone was breathing relieved sighs—and encountering sudden celebrity.

Martha Quinn: J.J. and I were walking down 57th Street, and a homeless guy lying in a doorway looks up, and says, “Hey, aren’t you Martha Quinn?” We said, “Yeah, how’s it going?” We walk away and I say to J.J., “How’s that guy have cable?”

Jordan Rost: When I worked for NBC and wore my logo baseball cap, no one cared. I’d wear an MTV jacket, and I couldn’t get three blocks without being asked four times, “You really work for MTV?”

Gale Sparrow: When people like Elton John started calling to say, “Can I be a guest V.J.?,” you knew we were making it. Everyone wanted to come on board. People weren’t calling about their lower acts—they were calling about their main acts. It was like, “Do you have room for an interview?” I had a staff of eight, and we couldn’t even cover the calls. We were getting 250 a day.

Nick Rhodes, keyboardist, Duran Duran: We’d go over to their studio several times a week whenever we were in Manhattan. Andy Warhol was a friend of ours and we took him down there. He loved it. Just sat taking photographs the whole time of absolutely nothing. But Andy was thrilled to see what the MTV experience was all about.

Judy McGrath: We got Motörhead to tape an MTV I.D. At the shoot, Sykes was saying, “I want you to say, ‘Hi, I’m Lemmy from Motörhead, and you’re watching MTV.’ ” The camera rolled, and Lemmy said, “This is Motörhead, and if you don’t watch MTV, I’m coming to your house and rip up your lawn and tear your poodle’s head off.” We run this thing, and all of a sudden I am getting calls from Steve Tyler and Tina Turner saying, “Hey, I want to do one of those.” And I thought, You do?

MTV’s corporate parent, Warner Amex, meanwhile, was posting heavy losses, in part because the Movie Channel was taking a clobbering at the hands of Cinemax, a competing “flanker brand” recently released by HBO. Fed up, American Express persuaded Ross to sell most of the Movie Channel to Viacom, and ousted Warner Amex’s C.E.O. The new chief was Ronald Reagan’s transportation secretary Drew Lewis, who’d shown his tough-mindedness by firing the nation’s striking air-traffic controllers. The first casualty at MTV was Lack, who left in January 1983. McGroarty departed shortly thereafter. Though Schneider remained in his post, MTV’s master was now Bob Pittman.

Brian Diamond: Physically, Bob wasn’t around much, but everybody felt his presence. The running joke was that Bob would call and say, “Get the plants off the set.” Three days later: “Put the plants back on the set.” It was like, “Oh, my God, Big Brother’s watching. We can’t get away with anything anymore.” We all knew who was driving the ship.

Tom Freston: Bob made the old suits at Warner and Amex feel comfortable that they were in good hands with a smart guy who was ready to exploit popular culture in a smart way. He had a relentless focus on “What does the consumer really want? If we get into his head, everything else kind of comes together.”

Gale Sparrow: Pittman lost his eye when he was a child, and Garland lost his eye when he was at MTV because they sent him the wrong medication, and John Sykes had a sort of an astigmatism, though the rumor was that he would have knocked out both his eyes if he had to. One day, I came down with an eye inflammation. Pittman looked at me and said, “Gale, I always knew you were executive material.”

Fred Seibert: One night we are at a company retreat out at the end of Long Island, and eight or nine of us end up in a rental car. Everyone is sitting on someone else’s lap, including Bob, who’s in the backseat behind Dwight Tierney, who’s driving. It’s dark. There are no streetlights anywhere. Bob reaches up and puts his hands over Dwight’s eyes. “Keep driving,” he says. We’re all thinking, God, we are going to die. Bob goes, “Aw, we did this in Mississippi all the time.” The woman who is sitting next to me says, “That’s what I like about him. He’s fearless.”

Pittman would need courage to handle MTV’s finances. In two years on the air, the channel had racked up a reported $33.9 million in losses and was projected to lose $20 million more in 1983. Lewis had other ideas.

Bob Pittman: Drew Lewis took me out to lunch and said, “Bob, either you get the loss down to $12 million or we’re going to shut it down.” So we had to start whacking everything to make it happen.

Mark Booth: Penetration of cable was modest, ad sales were modest, expenses were high. Warner Amex was saying, “Either you crack the economics or you’re gone. We’re not the Salvation Army.”

Doug Herzog, director, MTV News: All of a sudden, every dime was being watched. The whole idea was to see what we can do for nothing.

David Hilton, head of affiliate sales and marketing: It went from being “Can we do this?” to “How can we make it profitable?”

To Pittman and Horowitz, it was evident that neither cost-cutting nor ad revenues would be sufficient to lift MTV from the red.

Bob Pittman: No one in the cable business had been successful being entirely advertiser-supported. If we were ever going to make any money, we had to get the cable operators to pay.

David Horowitz: That’s when it hit the fan. The attitude of the cable operators was that we were damned lucky they were letting us onto their systems.

Mark Booth: We went back and said, “This isn’t going to work out the way it’s been working. Here’s our new rate card—10 cents per home per month—and we will give you a much better deal now than if you wait.” The cable industry saw that if they wanted to have a more robust content community, they needed to re-distribute the wealth. We basically created a strategy that enabled everyone to win.

John Reardon, vice president, national accounts: Mark Booth and I walked out the door of a cable operator in Colorado after doing our first contract. And right there in the parking lot, we jumped up in the air and slapped hands, and said, “Jesus God, we are actually going to get money for this thing!”

While cable operators were having their arms twisted, MTV was coming under increasing fire for its nearly all-white playlist. The most vocal critic was “Slick” Rick James. After MTV passed on his “Super Freak” video, he publicly accused the channel of “taking black people back 400 years,” setting off a torrent of charge and countercharge.

John Sykes: Racism was the furthest thing from our minds. We were trying to build a very narrowly focused channel, just like radio. The problem was, we were the only game in town, so the media was expecting us to be like traditional TV and put on all things for all people. From everything we’d learned in radio, that didn’t work. No one from the country community was picketing out front, saying, “Why aren’t you playing country artists?”

Tom Freston: If you look at who was making rock music in those days, it was pretty much white boys with guitars. There were some black artists who got rotation on MTV, but not many, because there weren’t a lot of black artists playing rock ’n’ roll. When clips came in, the programming guys were a bit overly religious on the issue. The playlist was a lot stricter than it had to be, because we really didn’t have any competition out there.

Charles M. Young, writer, promotions and shows: I was coming home on the subway wearing my MTV jacket, and this black kid comes up to me, and he was so excited. He wanted to work at MTV; he just loved it. We got off at the same stop, and we talked about MTV all the way to my apartment. I went in feeling so rotten that there was no black music on MTV. I thought, God, this is completely unfair.

Carolyn Baker, director of talent acquisitions: MTV was supposed to be a white-boys’ channel, and it was really set in stone. I’m black, and Rick would talk to me about it, Stevie Wonder would, Teddy Pendergrass would, Nick Ashford and Valerie Simpson would. But it was not a subject that I ever really talked about at MTV. But it did come up with Bob when he wouldn’t let me buy a long James Brown piece. He said, “My audience doesn’t think that rock ’n’ roll came from James Brown; they believe it came from the Beatles.”

J. J. Jackson: I was sent to cover a birthday party Bill Cosby was throwing for Miles Davis. We sit down and Miles looks me dead straight in the eyes and says, “Tell me, young man, how come MTV doesn’t play any black videos?” I said, “Well, at this point, our format is rock ’n’ roll, and Jimi Hendrix didn’t make any videos. We don’t play Elvis Presley, either, and some people consider him the father of rock ’n’ roll. Or Dwight Yoakam, or any of those people. Believe me, if I thought they weren’t playing black artists because they were black, there’s no way in hell I would be their patsy for that.” He looked at me for like 20 seconds—man, it felt like a lifetime—and said absolutely nothing. Finally, he went, “Very good, young man.”

Mark Goodman: People would say, “Pittman’s from the South. What do you expect?” But I bought the corporate line, which was MTV is like rock radio. Rock radio would not be playing the Temptations or James Brown. We play rock artists. Then Let’s Dance came out, and I sat down to interview David Bowie. He had a camera crew with him, and heavy executives were standing around, watching. I said, “Get ready, because I’ve got all the tough questions lined up for you.” David said, “Good, because I want to ask you some punishing questions.” I chuckled, not knowing what he had in store. After the interview, he asks me, “Why do you think MTV doesn’t play black music?” I said, “We try to play music for a particular type of demographic and genre.” He said, “What about all the black kids?” I said, “You got to talk to MTV about that.” I got hung out to dry.

Pittman refused to budge. Then, in January 1983, Michael Jackson released a single from his new album, Thriller. “Billie Jean,” an up-tempo pop tale of the travails brought on by a trumped-up paternity charge, bulleted onto the Billboard Hot 100. A video soon followed, but despite its quick climb to No. 1 and intensive lobbying from CBS Records, “Billie Jean” received no airplay on MTV. Why it was finally added to the channel’s rotation is hotly disputed.

David Benjamin, vice president for business affairs, CBS Records: I was sitting in my office, and Susan Blond, who was in charge of videos at Epic, came in, in tears. She says, “We just spent all this money on Michael Jackson’s video. It’s brilliant, but they won’t play it.” Immediately, I call Pittman; he’s in a meeting. Then I call Garland; he’s busy. Then I call Sykes; he picks up. “John,” I say, “the fickle finger of fate is pointed at you. I am now invoking the 24-hour kill clause in our contract. By tomorrow at this time I want every CBS video off MTV.” I walk to the other side of the floor to tell Walter Yetnikoff what I’ve done, and his secretary Bonnie is laughing. “What the fuck did you do? Pittman just called and he’s going crazy.” Walter waves me in, and he’s laughing, too. “David,” he says to me, “look who’s on the phone. Our good friend Bob Pittman.” “No kidding,” I say. “Yes,” Walter says. “He says that all we had to do was call and ask. Of course they would play the video. No problem.” “Gee, I’m sorry, Walter,” I say. “That’s O.K.,” Walter says. “But in future you just call up Bob. He’ll do whatever we want.”

Les Garland: “Billie Jean” came in, and it blew my mind. The whole staff flipped over it. I phoned Pittman, who was in California, and said, “Bob, I’m FedExing the most amazing video to you. Wait till you see it.” He calls the next day, and he’s like, “God, this is great.” I said, “There is no question here, is there?” He says, “You do what you want to do.” I said, “You know what I am going to do.” And he says, “Fine.” The problem was, we waited three or five days to put it on, ’cause of whatever, and someone misinterpreted it as us holding back. The next thing you know, this whole thing with CBS blows up. We’re looking at each other, saying, “Where did this thing come from?”

“Billie Jean” was followed by “Beat It,” and both were among the most popular videos in MTV history. Their repeated airing helped propel Thriller to sales of 800,000 per week, and prompted CBS Records to commission the title cut as the third video from the album. Directed by John Landis of Blues Brothers fame, “Thriller” ran an unprecedented 14 minutes and cost an equally unprecedented $1.1 million—more than 20 times the most expensive video to date. Yet another precedent was shattered when Pittman agreed to pay $250,000 for first-air rights, the expenditure disguised as a cost of a “making of” documentary. While shooting was in progress, Garland visited the set.

Les Garland: I’m invited to Michael’s trailer. I’m waiting in the living room when all of the sudden a pair of socks comes flying out from this dark room in the back and lands at my feet. His assistant says, “That means Michael is ready to see you.” So I pick up his socks and go back. He’s lying down and I sit and we talk for an hour. He said, “Garland, I just want to thank you so much for everything you’ve done through MTV to support my career.” I said, “Stop, man, I am the guy who should be saying ‘Thank you’ to you for making such great music for such great videos.” When “Thriller” came out, we’d play it two or three times a day. We also pre-promoted every time it was going to play, and every time it did, it spiked the ratings. That’s when we knew that event programming would work within the confines of what we were doing at MTV.

MTV, which had already made the careers of Culture Club, Cyndi Lauper, and Duran Duran, would fuel other made-for-video mega-stars, none brighter—or more controversial—than the Material Girl.

John Sykes: The first time I met Madonna was at Café Un Deux Trois on 44th Street. She was very quiet and very controlled and kind of was letting her attitude be known. Which was this kind of street-smart, tough woman who wanted to do business. She had like a Screaming Mimi’s kind of retro outfit on, a little veil over her face. She wanted to find out what we were doing and talk to us about her music. But she was very guarded and wasn’t going to offer her friendship that easily. Basically, she was setting her image with us that we were going to have to come to her. She knew exactly how to package herself, exactly how much to give each time, exactly how to make the look as important as the sound. She really represented, along with Michael Jackson, the beginning of a new video generation. A lot of artists that only cared about the look, or only cared about the sound, never made the transition and kind of went by the wayside. But she understood the balance.

Gale Sparrow: She had one video, a disco-like thing, called “Electric” something, and she asked if, as a favor, we’d play it late at night, so she could watch it herself. We weren’t sure, because it really wasn’t our format. But Garland said, “She’s so sexy, let’s just play it really late or early in the morning and Pittman will never know.” But Pittman did watch, and every now and then he’d call Garland and say, “Bud, what’s going on? You guys are getting out of line.” But the channel was looking nice, and Pittman let us do it. And, boy, did that favor pay off. Because her next video was—wow!—night-and-day better. We played the hell out of that. “Borderline” was next and Madonna was a star. That’s when everything started changing. It wasn’t just AOR music. It was a little more pop. The image became as important as the music.

Marcy Brafman: We fought about putting Madonna on. There was this feeling that she was too pop, too dance-music, and we weren’t about dance music. When her stuff took hold, it changed something in not a good way. It became more glitz and showbizzy. It was not that free, wildness-of-youth, born-to-raise-hell kind of rock ’n’ roll. It was engineered. It was entertainment.

Jeff Ayeroff, creative director, Warner bros. Records: Madonna was the first act I worked with at Warner, and I was wheeling and dealing with Sykes and Gale Sparrow, saying, “This girl is going to be the biggest star on MTV.” They got her right away, but they didn’t get her music right away, so they were sort of hesitant. We did a series of videos, and one of them—where she’s this street girl who gets picked up by the photographer and she spray-paints his car—started the phenomenon. They realized they had something that brings their audience to them. She was the right person, the right artist, the right product, at the right time. Madonna fed them, and they fed her. They went hand in hand together.

The success of Madonna and Michael Jackson sent video-production costs spiraling, enraging record-company executives and artists alike. The airwaves, meanwhile, were filling up with music-video shows, hoping to ape MTV’s exploding popularity. To stanch the competition on the one hand, and placate the record companies on the other, Pittman began offering labels payments for hot videos in return for “windows of exclusivity.” Under pressure from increasingly vocal interest groups, as well as image-nervous American Express, MTV also began cracking down harder on video content.

Stan Cornyn: We gave Madonna a video to do, and the cost was going to be $10,000. Then the producer says, “We want to shoot it in Italy, so it’s going to be 25.” Madonna is starring for us, so we come up with the 25. Well, the whole thing ends up at $100,000. At this point, the management of record companies are shitting cornerstone-size bricks.

Bob Summer: One video we did for George Michael was something in excess of a low-budget movie. The artists were demanding it, and if you didn’t have a video available at the time of launch, you weren’t competitive. It’s that simple. The all-powerful record companies found themselves in the position of being leveraged by the MTV gang.

Bob Krasnow, president, Elektra Records: We were spending $300,000 on a video more often than not. And I started seeing a very subtle change in the bands. All of the sudden, they were starting to realize that they couldn’t go out in this national format with bellies. They needed to take care of their whole appearance. They were getting slimmed down, more muscular. Appearance became important. People were realizing, “Hey, this is a professional business we’re in that’s grossing millions of dollars.” The whole mentality of how we approached our business was changing dramatically.

Billy Idol: You saw the big guns move in on MTV. Suddenly, you were competing on a level that was ridiculous. People like Michael Jackson moved everything up. Instead of $200,000, it was $2 million. It stopped the homegrown effect—it became video hell.

Stan Cornyn: MTV asking for exclusives was another astonishing, throw-them-out-of-the-office thing to do. The ballsiness of these guys. I sometimes thought that maybe that’s why Horowitz and Pittman wore glasses—so they wouldn’t get hit too badly.

Bob Krasnow: It was a small amount of money, but the point was, MTV was actually paying us, which was a lot better than us paying disc jockeys to play our records. This was a total turnabout. You had to grovel to get your records played on most radio stations, and here was this huge new idea—actually cultivating relationships.

Tim Newman, video director for ZZ Top: It pissed everybody off. The labels had a chance to encourage competition. Instead, they delivered themselves into the hands of MTV, which was a winner. It changed the whole game.

Jack Schneider: There was one Mick Jagger thing, where you opened a refrigerator and there were decapitated heads. I?said, “What? I can’t put that on the air.” “Well, you must,” I was told, “because if you don’t, Mick said he’s never going to give us anything again.” “In a pig’s ass,” I said. “Mick will give us anything we want, because we sell records.”

Jo Bergman, video-department head, Warner Bros. Records: Anything that Standards and Practices decided was a little too risqué, had too much flesh, would get kicked back for recut. You had to go frame by frame because somebody thought they saw the shadow of a nipple. There was crying in the editing rooms. Tempers were raw.

Billy Idol: Pressure groups started to look in on what you were doing, and say, “Oh, you offended women’s liberation,” or whatever. In the beginning, you could have a lighted cross behind you, and people didn’t think you were trying to be the Ku Klux Klan. It wasn’t being taken quite so seriously. Now MTV wanted to control more and more what you said. You were getting, “People should do this in videos, they shouldn’t do that.”

More changes were in the offing, after MTV and Nickelodeon were listed as a publicly traded company, MTV Networks Inc., in the summer of 1984, with Warner Amex retaining a controlling interest. The first alteration was the removal of Jack Schneider, and the naming of David Horowitz as president and C.E.O. A move that caused far more internal consternation was the lopsided award of stock options. Corporate behavior was now the order of the day.

Chip Rachlin, director of long-form acquisitions: Bob got 100,000 shares, vice presidents and above 10,000 shares, and then it dropped for everybody else to 25 shares for every year of service. When you’ve got people in their 20s and early 30s really into what they are doing, not looking at the clock and giving you everything they’ve got—I felt that didn’t translate.

Dom Fioravanti: Going public made you realize that MTV was more than just fun—it was a big-money game. There was intense pressure every day: how we spent and managed our money; issues of ratings and demographics; how we were going to hit certain targets in order to satisfy the financial community. The ad-sales people, of course, were always interested in making money. But the programming people—it was difficult to get them to recognize that a corner had been turned, and that this was now a business, which needed to go in some direction other than just plain fun. That was my mission from Bob Pittman. I was supposed to be the one to provide maturity to the playpen, so to speak. It was almost sad, because it had started off in a very innocent way—all these young kids, and all they wanted to do was create art and participate in this incredible phenomenon. But when the money began to flow, it went 180 degrees in the other direction. This was the rock ’n’ roll generation grown up.

Marcy Brafman: People were jockeying for positions and power. It was as if suddenly there was a realization that there was something to protect. The minute that happens, it kills the entrepreneurial edge that drives something. I noticed the change in lots of ways: the number of people who had to approve creative; the chances we were willing to take with the statements we made; the second-guessing on almost everything. They wanted everything to be corporate. It stopped wanting to be new.

Andy Setos: Everything started to get out of hand when we made money. Because then everyone realized that whoever holds on the hardest gets a lot. That’s when it got dark—when the building was over, more or less, and we were much more into a maintenance mode.

Dwight Tierney, head of personnel, wasec: I was in a meeting one day with an executive who professed long and loudly—more than any other exec in the company—about the importance of decency to people, how people were the most important thing and blah, blah, blah. And I said to her, “Look, I’ve got to talk to you about one of your execs. She humiliated a new hire in the hallway, screamed and yelled at her in public. It was absolutely appalling.” And this executive said to me, “Yeah, but did you see the numbers she brought in?” I thought to myself, Things are really changing.

Gale Sparrow: My old boss, the nicest guy in the world, learned he’d been fired when he came to work and found that all his belongings had been moved out of his office. My new boss calls me in and says, “Gale, you’ve been way too kind to these record company people. We have to play hardball. We want only the biggest acts, and we aren’t going to play anymore of this little bullshit stuff.” I said, “This ‘little bullshit stuff’ put us on the map.” I think about it for a week, decide I’m not buying it, that it’s time to leave. I tell my boss and he says, “You must have PMS.” I say, “I’m outta here.”

Alan Hunter: We’d been loose as a goose for three or four years. There was nothing I couldn’t do, no irreverence I couldn’t be involved in. If I wanted to pick my nose on-air, I knew I could. Then one day we found we couldn’t be little kids anymore. Bob wanted more respectability for the channel. So we were sent to this communication lady, who’d coached George Bush and Dan Rather and heavy-duty people like that. We’d sit down with her and go through our little tapes. I might have made some offhand remark, like “Check that out.” She’d stop the tape and go, “Alan, we need to work on your full-sentence skills.” We did this for an hour every week for six months. It drove you crazy.

Jo Bergman: Periodically MTV would have meetings to pump you up about the new acts you were coming out with. Somehow, I got the wrong invitation—not to the label pump-you-up meeting, but to the advertiser pump-you-up meeting. It had nothing to do with music. The focus was on “You should be buying time with us, because we are going to deliver the demographics, whatever it takes.” That was whipping a Band-Aid from the eyes. We felt we were inventing something new. It turned out we were actually making commercials.

But MTV could still put on a great show. That was demonstrated in September 1984, when, in an extravaganza featuring Tina Turner, Huey Lewis and the News, Rod Stewart, and channel queen Madonna, the first annual MTV Video Music Awards were staged at Radio City Music Hall.

Les Garland: Up until a week before the show, Madonna didn’t know what kind of a set she wanted. But one day she calls and goes, “Garland, I’ve got it. I want a tiger. I want to lay around and sing ‘Like a Virgin’ to the tiger.” I said, “I don’t think we can do that at Radio City. If that tiger went nuts and ate Walter Yetnikoff, I’ve got a fucking problem.” She died laughing, and I said I’d check it out. I did, and I call her back and say they are not going to let us have any tigers at Radio City. So she comes back with a 17-foot cake we only had five days to build for her. It threw us overbudget, that frigging cake. At rehearsal, she’s climbing up the cake and has on this wedding thing with nothing else on underneath. I’m standing below her and looking up, and going, “Hmmm … ” She looks down and says, “How does my butt look?” “Looks good from down here,” I say.

Andy Setos: Midtown Manhattan was MTV for that evening. There were limos up and down Sixth Avenue—it was just un-freaking-believable. It was the ticket in town.

Beverly Weinstein: Everybody wanted to go: every advertiser in the world, every client in the world. I was thinking, Whoa, look at this. We are a big deal.

John Reardon: All the cable operators are in their tuxedos, and their wives are dressed to the nines, and they’re not believing what they’re seeing: Mayor Koch with a gloved hand, acting like Michael Jackson, Bette Midler and Dan Aykroyd in their space suits. My wife and I are sitting in the fourth row, pinching ourselves. Then Madonna comes out in a wedding dress with a jeweled boy toy belt and lies down on the stage and is humpin’ up and down, singing “Like a Virgin.” I’m saying to myself, Oh my God, what are the cable operators thinking? But I didn’t lose a single customer. They talked about that night forever.

Par Charles de La Barre - Publié dans : overreaction
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Créer un blog gratuit sur over-blog.com - Contact - C.G.U. - Rémunération en droits d'auteur - Signaler un abus